Literature DB >> 16134978

User-friendly models of the costs and efficacy of tsetse control: application to sterilizing and insecticidal techniques.

G A Vale1, S J Torr.   

Abstract

An interactive programme, incorporating a deterministic model of tsetse (Diptera: Glossinidae) populations, was developed to predict the cost and effect of different control techniques applied singly or together. Its value was exemplified by using it to compare: (i) the sterile insect technique (SIT), involving weekly releases optimized at three sterile males for each wild male, and (ii) insecticide-treated cattle (ITC) at 3.5/km(2). The isolated pre-treatment population of adults was 2500 males and 5000 females/km(2); if the population was reduced by 90%, its growth potential was 8.4 times per year. However, the population expired naturally when it was reduced to 0.1 wild males/km(2), due to difficulties in finding mates, so that control measures then stopped. This took 187 days with ITC and 609 days with SIT. If ITC was used for 87 days to suppress the population by 99%, subsequent control by SIT alone took 406 days; the female population increased by 48% following the withdrawal of ITC and remained above the immediate post-suppression level for 155 days; the vectorial capacity initially increased seven times and remained above the immediate post-suppression level for 300 days. Combining SIT and ITC after suppression was a little faster than ITC alone, provided the population had not been suppressed by more than 99.7%. Even when SIT was applied under favourable conditions, the most optimistic cost estimate was 20-40 times greater than for ITC. Modelling non-isolated unsuppressed populations showed that tsetse invaded approximately 8 km into the ITC area compared to approximately 18 km for SIT. There was no material improvement by using a 3-km barrier of ITC to protect the SIT area. In general, tsetse control by increasing deaths is more appropriate than reducing births, and SIT is particularly inappropriate. User-friendly models can assist the understanding and planning of tsetse control. The model, freely available via http://www.tsetse.org, allows further exploration of control strategies with user-specified assumptions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16134978     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00573.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Vet Entomol        ISSN: 0269-283X            Impact factor:   2.739


  20 in total

1.  GIS and multiple-criteria evaluation for the optimisation of tsetse fly eradication programmes.

Authors:  Elias Symeonakis; Tim Robinson; Nick Drake
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-10-21       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Sterile-insect methods for control of mosquito-borne diseases: an analysis.

Authors:  Luke Alphey; Mark Benedict; Romeo Bellini; Gary G Clark; David A Dame; Mike W Service; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.133

3.  Scaling up of tsetse control to eliminate Gambian sleeping sickness in northern Uganda.

Authors:  Andrew Hope; Albert Mugenyi; Johan Esterhuizen; Inaki Tirados; Lucas Cunningham; Gala Garrod; Mike J Lehane; Joshua Longbottom; Tn Clement Mangwiro; Mercy Opiyo; Michelle Stanton; Steve J Torr; Glyn A Vale; Charles Waiswa; Richard Selby
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2022-06-29

Review 4.  Tsetse flies: genetics, evolution, and role as vectors.

Authors:  E S Krafsur
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  An agent-based model to simulate tsetse fly distribution and control techniques: a case study in Nguruman, Kenya.

Authors:  Shengpan Lin; Mark H DeVisser; Joseph P Messina
Journal:  Ecol Modell       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 2.974

6.  Tsetse Fly Control in Kenya's Spatially and Temporally Dynamic Control Reservoirs: A Cost Analysis.

Authors:  Paul F McCord; Joseph P Messina; David J Campbell; Sue C Grady
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2011-12-07

7.  Best-bet integrated strategies for containing drug-resistant trypanosomes in cattle.

Authors:  Erick O Mungube; Oumar Diall; Maximilian P O Baumann; Antje Hoppenheit; Barbara Hinney; Burkhard Bauer; Yousouf Sanogo; Brehima Maiga; Karl-Hans Zessin; Thomas F Randolph; Peter-Henning Clausen
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Is the even distribution of insecticide-treated cattle essential for tsetse control? Modelling the impact of baits in heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Steve J Torr; Glyn A Vale
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2011-10-18

9.  Cost analysis of options for management of African Animal Trypanosomiasis using interventions targeted at cattle in Tororo District; south-eastern Uganda.

Authors:  Dennis Muhanguzi; Walter O Okello; John D Kabasa; Charles Waiswa; Susan C Welburn; Alexandra P M Shaw
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.876

10.  Defining challenges and proposing solutions for control of the virus vector Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Amy C Morrison; Emily Zielinski-Gutierrez; Thomas W Scott; Ronald Rosenberg
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.