Literature DB >> 16134737

Outcome after severe brain damage, what makes the difference?

A Sörbo1, B Rydenhag, K S Sunnerhagen, M Blomqvist, S Svensson, I Emanuelson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the consequences for outcome in terms of the dimensions of activity and participation for two groups: group A, which received early formalized rehabilitation, and group B, which received late or no formalized rehabilitation. RESEARCH
DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. PROCEDURE: Twenty-six patients (A: n = 14 and B: n = 12) with severe brain damage were included. The participants were assessed a mean of 26.6 months (SD 7.1, median 25, range 14-41) after the incident using the structured form for the Swedish Neuro database, the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS), the Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).
RESULTS: The study reveals a better outcome for group A. No patient remained in a vegetative state in group A as compared with three in group B. In group A, 50% were independent as compared with 17% in group B. The frequency of return to work was 43% in group A, but no patient in group B had returned to work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16134737     DOI: 10.1080/02699050400013709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Inj        ISSN: 0269-9052            Impact factor:   2.311


  7 in total

Review 1.  How should functional imaging of patients with disorders of consciousness contribute to their clinical rehabilitation needs?

Authors:  Steven Laureys; Joseph T Giacino; Nicholas D Schiff; Manuel Schabus; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 2.  Neurological susceptibility to a skull defect.

Authors:  Stephen Honeybul
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-06-04

3.  Brain injury rehabilitation after road trauma in new South Wales, Australia - insights from a data linkage study.

Authors:  Jane Wu; Steven G Faux; Christopher J Poulos; Ian Harris
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Validity of the Early Functional Ability scale (EFA) among critically ill patients undergoing early neurological rehabilitation.

Authors:  Melanie Boltzmann; Simone B Schmidt; Christoph Gutenbrunner; Joachim K Krauss; Günter U Höglinger; Christian Weimar; Jens D Rollnik
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Effectiveness of a Very Early Stepping Verticalization Protocol in Severe Acquired Brain Injured Patients: A Randomized Pilot Study in ICU.

Authors:  Giuseppe Frazzitta; Ilaria Zivi; Roberto Valsecchi; Sara Bonini; Sara Maffia; Katia Molatore; Luca Sebastianelli; Alessio Zarucchi; Diana Matteri; Giuseppe Ercoli; Roberto Maestri; Leopold Saltuari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The severe traumatic brain injury in Austria: early rehabilitative treatment and outcome.

Authors:  Emanuel Steiner; Monika Murg-Argeny; Heinz Steltzer
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2016-03-15

7.  Early Rehabilitation Reduces Time to Decannulation in Patients With Severe Acquired Brain Injury: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ilaria Zivi; Roberto Valsecchi; Roberto Maestri; Sara Maffia; Alessio Zarucchi; Katia Molatore; Elena Vellati; Leopold Saltuari; Giuseppe Frazzitta
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.