OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were two-fold: (1) to assess the relationship between blood lead levels and neurobehavioral test performance in a nationally sample of adults from the third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey and (2) to analyze the results from previously published studies of occupational lead exposure that used the same neurobehavioral tests as those included in the survey. METHODS: Regression models were used to test and estimate the relationships between measurements of blood lead and performance on a simple reaction time, a symbol-digit substitution, and a serial digit learning test in adults aged 20-59 years who participated the survey. Mixed models were used to analyze the data from the occupational studies. RESULTS: The blood lead levels of those participating in the survey ranged from 0.7 to 41.8 microg/dl. The estimated geometric mean was 2.51 microg/dl, and the estimated arithmetic mean was 3.30 microg/dl. In the survey, no statistically significant relationships were found between blood lead concentration and performance on the three neurobehavioral tests when adjusted for covariates. In the occupational studies, the groups exposed to lead consistently performed worse than control groups on the simple reaction time and digit-symbol substitution tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the survey and the occupational studies do not provide evidence for impairment of neurobehavioral test performance at levels below 25 microg/dl, the concentration that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention define as elevated in adults. The average blood lead level of the exposed groups in the occupational studies was 41.07 microg/dl, less than 50 microg/dl, the minimum concentration that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires for medical removal from the workplace. Given the evidence of impaired neurobehavioral performance in these groups, the 50 microg/dl limit should be reevaluated.
OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were two-fold: (1) to assess the relationship between blood lead levels and neurobehavioral test performance in a nationally sample of adults from the third National Health and Nutrition Evaluation Survey and (2) to analyze the results from previously published studies of occupational lead exposure that used the same neurobehavioral tests as those included in the survey. METHODS: Regression models were used to test and estimate the relationships between measurements of blood lead and performance on a simple reaction time, a symbol-digit substitution, and a serial digit learning test in adults aged 20-59 years who participated the survey. Mixed models were used to analyze the data from the occupational studies. RESULTS: The blood lead levels of those participating in the survey ranged from 0.7 to 41.8 microg/dl. The estimated geometric mean was 2.51 microg/dl, and the estimated arithmetic mean was 3.30 microg/dl. In the survey, no statistically significant relationships were found between blood lead concentration and performance on the three neurobehavioral tests when adjusted for covariates. In the occupational studies, the groups exposed to lead consistently performed worse than control groups on the simple reaction time and digit-symbol substitution tests. CONCLUSIONS: The results from the survey and the occupational studies do not provide evidence for impairment of neurobehavioral test performance at levels below 25 microg/dl, the concentration that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention define as elevated in adults. The average blood lead level of the exposed groups in the occupational studies was 41.07 microg/dl, less than 50 microg/dl, the minimum concentration that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration requires for medical removal from the workplace. Given the evidence of impaired neurobehavioral performance in these groups, the 50 microg/dl limit should be reevaluated.
Authors: E F Krieg; D W Chrislip; R E Letz; D A Otto; C J Crespo; W S Brightwell; R L Ehrenberg Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Alfred Barth; Andreas W Schaffer; Wolf Osterode; Robert Winker; Christophoros Konnaris; Eva Valic; Christian Wolf; Hugo W Rüdiger Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2002-04-25 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: J A Valciukas; R Lilis; J Eisinger; W E Blumberg; A Fischbein; I J Selikoff Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 1978-07-14 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: B S Schwartz; B K Lee; G S Lee; W F Stewart; S S Lee; K Y Hwang; K D Ahn; Y B Kim; K I Bolla; D Simon; P J Parsons; A C Todd Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-03-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: George B Cruz; Michelle A Vasquez; Ericka Cabañas; Jewel N Joseph; Jourvonn C Skeen; Kirsten P Lynch; Isra Ahmed; Eric B Khairi; Jalen R Bonitto; Evan G Clarke; Samantha Rubi; Nimra Hameed; Sukhpreet Kaur; Neena Mathew; Teddy F Dacius; Tokunbo J Jose; Gabriella Handford; Samuel Wolfe; Alex Feher; Kyle Tidwell; Jon Tobin; Enero Ugalde; Samantha Fee; Allison Choe; Katherine Gillenwater; Bilal Hindi; Shawna Pilout; Nick R Natale; Nick Domahoski; Molly H Kent; Joanna C Jacob; Kelly G Lambert; Lorenz S Neuwirth Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Michelle A Vasquez; George B Cruz; Ericka Cabañas; Jewel N Joseph; Mohammad Mian; Sai Karthik V Madhira; Chelsea A Akintunde; Evan G Clarke; Jourvonn C Skeen; Jalen R Bonitto; Eric B Khairi; Kirsten P Lynch; Narmin H Mekawy; Abdeslem El Idrissi; Youngjoo Kim; Bright U Emenike; Lorenz S Neuwirth Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Lorenz S Neuwirth; Bright U Emenike; George B Cruz; Ericka Cabañas; Michelle A Vasquez; Jewel N Joseph; Zaid Ayaz; Mohammed Mian; Mohamed M Ali; Evan G Clarke; Eddy D Barrera; Nimra Hameed; Samantha Rubi; Teddy F Dacius; Jourvonn C Skeen; Jalen R Bonitto; Eric B Khairi; Asma Iqbal; Isra Ahmed; Tokunbo J Jose; Kirsten P Lynch; Amber Alivira; Neena Mathew; Sukhpreet Kaur; Sidrah Masood; Bettina Tranquilee; Veni Thiruverkadu Journal: Adv Exp Med Biol Date: 2022 Impact factor: 3.650
Authors: Michael J Kosnett; Richard P Wedeen; Stephen J Rothenberg; Karen L Hipkins; Barbara L Materna; Brian S Schwartz; Howard Hu; Alan Woolf Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2006-12-22 Impact factor: 9.031