Literature DB >> 16133950

Detecting deception via strategic disclosure of evidence.

Maria Hartwig1, Pär Anders Granhag, Leif A Strömwall, Aldert Vrij.   

Abstract

Deception detection research has largely neglected an important aspect of many investigations, namely that there often exists evidence against a suspect. This study examined the potentials of timing of evidence disclosure as a deception detection tool. The main prediction was that observers (N = 116) would obtain higher accuracy rates if the evidence against the suspects (N = 58) was presented in a late rather than early stage of the interrogation. This prediction was based on the idea that late evidence disclosure would trigger lack of consistencies between the liars' stories and the evidence; this could be used as a cue to deception. The main prediction received support. Late disclosure observers obtained an overall accuracy of 61.7%, compared to 42.9% of Early disclosure observers. Deceptive statements were identified with high accuracy (67.6%) in Late disclosure, indicating that the technique in this form is beneficial mainly for pinpointing lies.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16133950     DOI: 10.1007/s10979-005-5521-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  2 in total

1.  The effects of the putative confession and evidence presentation on maltreated and non-maltreated 9- to 12-year-olds' disclosures of a minor transgression.

Authors:  Angela D Evans; Thomas D Lyon
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2019-08-30

2.  It's the deceiver, not the receiver: No individual differences when detecting deception in a foreign and a native language.

Authors:  Marvin K H Law; Simon A Jackson; Eugene Aidman; Mattis Geiger; Sally Olderbak; Sabina Kleitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.