PURPOSE: Novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of recurrent gliomas are urgently needed. Pyrazoloacridine (PZA), a rationally synthesized acridine derivative, has shown promising antitumor activity against glioma lines in combination with platinum compounds. This phase I/II trial of the PZA/carboplatin combination in recurrent glioma patients consisted of two phase I studies (studies 1 and 2) and a phase II trial (study 3). The objectives of studies 1 and 2 were to (a) assess the safety and toxicity and to establish the phase II dose of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination for recurrent glioma patients on P450 inducing anticonvulsants, and (b) to confirm the phase II dose for patients not on P450 inducing anticonvulsants. The primary objectives of study 3 were to determine the efficacy of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination in patients with recurrent gliomas, to further assess the toxicity of the combination, and to evaluate the impact of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants on the pyrazoloacridine metabolism. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Both carboplatin and pyrazoloacridine were administered intravenously every 28 days. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: 14 patients were treated in the two phase I studies and 32 patients in the phase II trial. The phase II dose of the combination was PZA 400 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC of 5 every 28 days. Neutropenia (4 patients) and dyspnea (1 patient) was the dose limiting toxicity in the phase I studies. In the phase II trial, the most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression with grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events being observed in 22 and 19% of the patients, respectively. The antitumor activity of this regimen was limited; the response rate in the phase II trial was 0%, (95% CI:0-11%) while 12 of the 32 patients (38%) had stable disease with a median duration of 2 months. The percentage of phase II patients who were progression free at three months was 22% and at six months was 16%. Median survival from study entry was 5.0 months for phase I patients and 5.8 months for phase II patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed in 8 phase I patients demonstrated no significant impact of the enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants on the pharmacokinetics of pyrazoloacridine. CONCLUSIONS: The phase II dose of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination is pyrazoloacridine 400 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin AUC of 5. Antitumor activity in patients with recurrent gliomas was limited. Initial disease stabilization occurred in approximately 38% of the patients, with median duration of 2 months. Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants did not affect the pyrazoloacridine metabolism.
PURPOSE: Novel therapeutic agents in the treatment of recurrent gliomas are urgently needed. Pyrazoloacridine (PZA), a rationally synthesized acridine derivative, has shown promising antitumor activity against glioma lines in combination with platinum compounds. This phase I/II trial of the PZA/carboplatin combination in recurrent gliomapatients consisted of two phase I studies (studies 1 and 2) and a phase II trial (study 3). The objectives of studies 1 and 2 were to (a) assess the safety and toxicity and to establish the phase II dose of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination for recurrent gliomapatients on P450 inducing anticonvulsants, and (b) to confirm the phase II dose for patients not on P450 inducing anticonvulsants. The primary objectives of study 3 were to determine the efficacy of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination in patients with recurrent gliomas, to further assess the toxicity of the combination, and to evaluate the impact of enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants on the pyrazoloacridine metabolism. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Both carboplatin and pyrazoloacridine were administered intravenously every 28 days. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression or patient withdrawal. RESULTS: 14 patients were treated in the two phase I studies and 32 patients in the phase II trial. The phase II dose of the combination was PZA 400 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC of 5 every 28 days. Neutropenia (4 patients) and dyspnea (1 patient) was the dose limiting toxicity in the phase I studies. In the phase II trial, the most frequent toxicity was myelosuppression with grade 3 and 4 hematologic adverse events being observed in 22 and 19% of the patients, respectively. The antitumor activity of this regimen was limited; the response rate in the phase II trial was 0%, (95% CI:0-11%) while 12 of the 32 patients (38%) had stable disease with a median duration of 2 months. The percentage of phase II patients who were progression free at three months was 22% and at six months was 16%. Median survival from study entry was 5.0 months for phase I patients and 5.8 months for phase II patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis performed in 8 phase I patients demonstrated no significant impact of the enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants on the pharmacokinetics of pyrazoloacridine. CONCLUSIONS: The phase II dose of the pyrazoloacridine/carboplatin combination is pyrazoloacridine 400 mg/m(2) in combination with carboplatin AUC of 5. Antitumor activity in patients with recurrent gliomas was limited. Initial disease stabilization occurred in approximately 38% of the patients, with median duration of 2 months. Enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants did not affect the pyrazoloacridine metabolism.
Authors: Michael D Prados; S Clifford Schold; Howard A Fine; Kurt Jaeckle; Fred Hochberg; Laszlo Mechtler; Michael R Fetell; Surasak Phuphanich; Lynn Feun; Todd J Janus; Kathleen Ford; William Graney Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: P M LoRusso; S L Aukerman; L Polin; B G Redman; M Valdivieso; L Biernat; T H Corbett Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1990-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Alex A Adjei; Joel M Reid; Charles Erlichman; Jeff A Sloan; Henry C Pitot; Steven R Alberts; Richard M Goldberg; Lorelei J Hanson; Stacie Ruben; Scott A Boemer; Pamela Atherton; Matthew M Ames; Scott H Kaufmann Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Joel M Reid; Denise L Walker; Jennifer K Miller; Linda M Benson; Andrew J Tomlinson; Stephen Naylor; April L Blajeski; Patricia M LoRusso; Matthew M Ames Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Jean L Grem; Nancy Harold; Bruce Keith; Alice P Chen; Viven Kao; Chris H Takimoto; J Michael Hamilton; Janet Pang; Marie Pace; Gada B Jasser; Mary G Quinn; Brian P Monahan Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Paul D Brown; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Betsy R LaPlant; Kurt A Jaeckle Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2006-11-15 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Evanthia Galanis; Kurt A Jaeckle; Matthew J Maurer; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; James S Hardwick; John F Reilly; Andrey Loboda; Michael Nebozhyn; Valeria R Fantin; Victoria M Richon; Bernd Scheithauer; Caterina Giannini; Patrick J Flynn; Dennis F Moore; James Zwiebel; Jan C Buckner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-03-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kenneth L Pitter; Craig J Galbán; Stefanie Galbán; Omid Saeed Tehrani; Omid Saeed-Tehrani; Fei Li; Nikki Charles; Michelle S Bradbury; Oren J Becher; Thomas L Chenevert; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross; Eric C Holland; Dolores Hambardzumyan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-18 Impact factor: 3.240