AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Chemical and biological characteristics of LDL(-) from type 1 diabetic subjects were analysed. The diabetic patients were studied during poor and optimised glycaemic control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total LDL was subfractionated into electropositive LDL(+) and electronegative LDL(-) by anion exchange chromatography and the lipid and protein composition of the two determined. RESULTS: LDL(-) differed from LDL(+) in that it had higher triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids, apoE, apoC-III and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), as well as lower apoB relative content. No evidence of increased oxidation was observed in LDL(-). LDL(-) increased two-fold the release of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) in endothelial cells, suggesting an inflammatory role. Optimisation of glycaemic control after insulin therapy decreased the proportion of LDL(-), but did not modify the composition of LDL subfractions, except for a decrease in PAF-AH activity in LDL(-). The possibility that LDL(-) could be generated by non-enzymatic glycosylation was studied. Fructosamine and glycated LDL content in LDL subfractions from type 1 diabetic patients was greater than in LDL subfractions isolated from normoglycaemic subjects, and decreased after glycaemic optimisation in both subfractions. However, no difference was observed between LDL(+) and LDL(-) before and after insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These results provide evidence that LDL(-) is not produced by glycosylation. Nevertheless, LDL(-) from diabetic patients displays inflammatory potential reflected by the induction of chemokine release in endothelial cells. This proatherogenic effect could be related to the high PAF-AH activity in LDL(-).
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Chemical and biological characteristics of LDL(-) from type 1 diabetic subjects were analysed. The diabeticpatients were studied during poor and optimised glycaemic control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total LDL was subfractionated into electropositive LDL(+) and electronegative LDL(-) by anion exchange chromatography and the lipid and protein composition of the two determined. RESULTS: LDL(-) differed from LDL(+) in that it had higher triglyceride, non-esterified fatty acids, apoE, apoC-III and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH), as well as lower apoB relative content. No evidence of increased oxidation was observed in LDL(-). LDL(-) increased two-fold the release of interleukin 8 (IL-8) and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) in endothelial cells, suggesting an inflammatory role. Optimisation of glycaemic control after insulin therapy decreased the proportion of LDL(-), but did not modify the composition of LDL subfractions, except for a decrease in PAF-AH activity in LDL(-). The possibility that LDL(-) could be generated by non-enzymatic glycosylation was studied. Fructosamine and glycated LDL content in LDL subfractions from type 1 diabeticpatients was greater than in LDL subfractions isolated from normoglycaemic subjects, and decreased after glycaemic optimisation in both subfractions. However, no difference was observed between LDL(+) and LDL(-) before and after insulin therapy. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: These results provide evidence that LDL(-) is not produced by glycosylation. Nevertheless, LDL(-) from diabeticpatients displays inflammatory potential reflected by the induction of chemokine release in endothelial cells. This proatherogenic effect could be related to the high PAF-AH activity in LDL(-).
Authors: O Ziouzenkova; L Asatryan; M Akmal; C Tetta; M L Wratten; G Loseto-Wich; G Jürgens; J Heinecke; A Sevanian Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-07-02 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: M Serban; Cristina Tanaseanu; T Kosaka; Cristina Vidulescu; Irina Stoian; Daciana S Marta; S Tanaseanu; Elena Moldoveanu Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2002 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 5.310
Authors: H Mangge; K Schauenstein; L Stroedter; A Griesl; W Maerz; M Borkenstein Journal: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 2.949
Authors: H N Hodis; D M Kramsch; P Avogaro; G Bittolo-Bon; G Cazzolato; J Hwang; H Peterson; A Sevanian Journal: J Lipid Res Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 5.922
Authors: Der-Yuan Chen; Tatsuya Sawamura; Richard A F Dixon; José Luis Sánchez-Quesada; Chu-Huang Chen Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.241