Literature DB >> 16132740

How predatory mites find plants with whitefly prey.

Maria Nomikou1, Ruixia Meng, Ruud Schraag, Maurice W Sabelis, Arne Janssen.   

Abstract

We investigated the searching behaviour of two species of predatory mites, Typhlodromips swirskii (Athias-Henriot) and Euseius scutalis (Athias-Henriot), both known to feed on immature stages of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. When released in a greenhouse inside a circle of cucumber plants that were alternatingly clean or infested with immature whiteflies, the mites took several days to find plants. Both species were recaptured significantly more on plants with whiteflies. This suggests that the mites are able to discriminate between plants with and without whiteflies. The predators may either have been attracted to plants with whiteflies from a distance or arrested on plants with whiteflies. Typhlodromips swirskii that had previously fed on whitefly immatures on cucumber leaves were significantly attracted by volatiles from cucumber plants with whiteflies in a Y-tube olfactometer. This suggests that the mites use volatile cues to discriminate between infested and clean plants. However, this response waned rapidly; if predators, experienced as above, were starved for 3-4 h in absence of cucumber leaves, they no longer preferred volatiles of infested plants to clean plants. Furthermore, T. swirskii that had no experience with immature whiteflies on cucumber plants also did not prefer odours of infested plants to those of clean plants. Because the release experiment with this species in the greenhouse was done with inexperienced predators, this suggests that the aggregation of mites on plants with whiteflies was mainly caused by differential arrestment of mites on plants with prey and clean plants. For T. swirskii, this was in agreement with the finding that the fraction of predators on plants with prey increased with time to levels higher than 70%. A less clear trend was found for E. scutalis, for which the fraction of predators on plants with prey stabilized soon after release to levels from 54-70%. Hence, the predatory mites may find plants with prey by random searching, but they are subsequently arrested on these plants. An earlier study showed that 87% of all whiteflies released in a set-up as used here were recaptured within 1 day. Hence, the effectiveness with which predatory mites locate plants with whiteflies is low compared with that of their prey. We expect this to generate spatial patterns in the dynamics of predator and prey and this may have consequences for biological control of whiteflies with predatory mites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132740     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-005-6650-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  14 in total

1.  Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature.

Authors:  A Kessler; I T Baldwin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that harbour predators of her offspring.

Authors:  Maria Nomikou; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids in plant-mite interactions: Variation caused by biotic and abiotic factors.

Authors:  J Takabayashi; M Dicke; M A Posthumus
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Spatial pattern formation in an insect host-parasitoid system

Authors: 
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic wasps.

Authors:  T C Turlings; J H Loughrin; P J McCall; U S Röse; W J Lewis; J H Tumlinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Origin of an insect outbreak: escape in space or time from natural enemies?

Authors:  John L Maron; Susan Harrison; Mary Greaves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Phytoseiid predators as potential biological control agents for Bemisia tabaci.

Authors:  M Nomikou; A Janssen; R Schraag; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Isolation and identification of volatile kairomone that affects acarine predatorprey interactions Involvement of host plant in its production.

Authors:  M Dicke; T A Van Beek; M A Posthumus; N Ben Dom; H Van Bokhoven; A De Groot
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Phytoseiid predators of whiteflies feed and reproduce on non-prey food sources.

Authors:  Maria Nomikou; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Phytoseiid predator of whitefly feeds on plant tissue.

Authors:  Maria Nomikou; Arne Janssen; Maurice W Sabelis
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.380

View more
  4 in total

1.  Plant cell piercing by a predatory mite: evidence and implications.

Authors:  E Adar; M Inbar; S Gal; L Issman; E Palevsky
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Amblyseius swirskii in greenhouse production systems: a floricultural perspective.

Authors:  Rosemarije Buitenhuis; Graeme Murphy; Les Shipp; Cynthia Scott-Dupree
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Herbivore-induced indirect defense across bean cultivars is independent of their degree of direct resistance.

Authors:  Zahra Tahmasebi; Helen Mohammadi; Gen-ichiro Arimura; Atsushi Muroi; Merijn R Kant
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Limited predator-induced dispersal in whiteflies.

Authors:  Rui-Xia Meng; Maurice W Sabelis; Arne Janssen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.