Literature DB >> 16132480

Transabdominal anastomosis after low anterior resection: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term results between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch.

Jeng-Kai Jiang1, Shung-Haur Yang, Jen-Kou Lin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colonic J-pouch has been constructed to overcome reservoir dysfunction after restorative rectal surgery, whereas no effort has been made for sphincter dysfunction. We conducted a prospective, randomized study comparing surgical and functional outcomes between side-to-end anastomosis and colonic J-pouch after low anterior resection in which the anastomosis was constructed from the abdomen.
METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with middle-to-low rectal cancer undergoing low anterior resection were randomly assigned to side-to-end or colonic J-pouch group preoperatively. Surgical outcomes of all the patients were recorded. Patients underwent functional evaluation, including anorectal manometry and functional assessment, preoperatively and then 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Twenty-four patients in each group completed the study. The demographic data and preoperative functional assessment did not differ between the two groups. There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes with regard to anastomotic height (5 cm), blood loss, protective colostomy, operative time, complications, and adjuvant therapy. Anal pressures showed no significant change postoperatively and during the follow-up period; there were no differences between the two groups. Temporal minor fecal incontinence was noted in the early postoperative period in both groups. With regard to bowel function, a significant reduction of volume of urgency and maximal tolerable volume was found postoperatively in both groups; however, a faster recovery was noted in the colonic J-pouch group. Stool frequency increased significantly after surgery in both groups; however, in contrast to rectal volume, a faster recovery was noted in the side-to-end group.
CONCLUSIONS: Anastomosis after low anterior resection for middle to low rectal cancer could be performed safely from the abdomen. It minimized sphincter injury and showed good continence preservation. On the other hand, the surgical outcomes and long-term functional results of side-to-end anastomosis were comparable with colonic J-pouch. Side-to-end anastomosis provides an easier, alternative way for reconstruction after restorative rectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132480     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0139-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

Review 1.  Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS): cause and effect and reconstructive considerations.

Authors:  Y Ziv; A Zbar; Y Bar-Shavit; I Igov
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Current Management and Future Directions.

Authors:  Timothy J Ridolfi; Nicholas Berger; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-09

3.  Completely intracorporeal anastomosis in robotic left colonic and rectal surgery: technique and 30-day outcomes.

Authors:  Pietro Achilli; William Perry; Fabian Grass; Mohamed A Abd El Aziz; Scott R Kelley; David W Larson; Kevin T Behm
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-15

4.  A meta-analysis comparing side to end with colonic J-pouch formation after anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  M R S Siddiqui; M S Sajid; W G A Woods; E Cheek; M K Baig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.781

5.  Totally intracorporeal laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis using circular stapler.

Authors:  Pascal Bucher; Philippe Wutrich; Francois Pugin; Michel Gonzales; Pascal Gervaz; Philippe Morel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  The colon J-pouch as a cause of evacuation disorders after rectal resection: myth or fact?

Authors:  Andreas D Rink; George Sgourakis; Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Hauke Lang; Karl-Heinz Vestweber
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Changes in surgical therapies for rectal cancer over the past 100 years: A review.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2020-05-10

Review 8.  Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sen Hou; Quan Wang; Shidong Zhao; Fan Liu; Peng Guo; Yingjiang Ye
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Reconstructive techniques after rectal resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  C J Brown; D S Fenech; R S McLeod
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-04-16

10.  Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by sphincter-preserving resection on anal sphincter function in relation to quality of life among locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Zerrin Ozgen; Sevgi Ozden; Beste M Atasoy; Hazan Ozyurt; Rasim Gencosmanoglu; Nese Imeryuz
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 3.481

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.