Literature DB >> 16132399

Measuring surgical quality: what's the role of provider volume?

Justin B Dimick1, John D Birkmeyer, Gilbert R Upchurch.   

Abstract

Although not ideal for all situations, provider volume is particularly suited for measuring surgical quality in certain contexts. Specifically, we believe that for uncommon operations with a strong volumes-outcome effect, provider volume may be the most informative performance measure. Because of the relative ease of determining provider volume, it will continue to be used in value-based purchasing and public reporting efforts. With increasing momentum from outside the profession of surgery, it is particularly important for surgeons to participate in making decisions regarding situations where volume may be an appropriate measure of quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132399     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7989-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.282


  15 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The public release of performance data: what do we expect to gain? A review of the evidence.

Authors:  M N Marshall; P G Shekelle; S Leatherman; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  The effect of the volume of procedures at transplantation centers on mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  E B Edwards; J P Roberts; M A McBride; J A Schulak; L G Hunsicker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Invited commentary: Surgeons, not General Motors, should set standards for surgical care.

Authors:  S F Khuri
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  How do we maximize the impact of the public reporting of quality of care?

Authors:  Martin N Marshall; Patrick S Romano; Huw T O Davies
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 8.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths.

Authors:  R A Dudley; K L Johansen; R Brand; D J Rennie; A Milstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; H Bernard; J F O'Donnell; G Lukacik; E P Shields
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  16 in total

1.  Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Examining the transferability of colon and rectal operative experience on outcomes following laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Jennie K Lee; Aristithes G Doumouras; Jeremy E Springer; Cagla Eskicioglu; Nalin Amin; Margherita Cadeddu; Dennis Hong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Laura Haas; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyoegg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-08

4.  Thyroid hormone replacement in women of reproductive age: is surgeon knowledge related to operative volume?

Authors:  Megan R Haymart; Max A Cayo; Herbert Chen
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.568

5.  Surgeon, not technique, defines outcomes after central venous port insertion.

Authors:  Audrey E Ertel; Zachary D McHenry; Vijay K Venkatesan; Dennis J Hanseman; Koffi Wima; Richard S Hoehn; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Volume of procedures and risk of recurrence after repair of groin hernia: national register study.

Authors:  Pär Nordin; Willem van der Linden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-04-21

Review 7.  Understanding Quality Measures in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Authors:  Peter M Vila; John S Schneider; Jay F Piccirillo; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.223

8.  The Association Between Provider Price and Complication Rates for Outpatient Surgical Services.

Authors:  Christopher Whaley
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Referral patterns for patients with high-risk thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Megan R Haymart; Mousumi Banerjee; Di Yang; Andrew K Stewart; Jennifer J Griggs; James C Sisson; Ronald J Koenig
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 10.  Quality of care in humanitarian surgery.

Authors:  Kathryn M Chu; Miguel Trelles; Nathan P Ford
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.