OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of ambulatory (out-patient) and in-patient pediatric health services for the year 1999 provided by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) at all the three levels-primary, secondary and tertiary level. METHODS: The costing module developed by Children's Vaccines Initiative (CVI) was used. This rapid assessment tool focuses on collection of data at macro level by using key informants like doctors, nursing staff, accountant, store keeper, engineer etc. Cost per beneficiary was estimated separately for in-patients and out-patients and was calculated by dividing the total cost of the services by the number of beneficiaries for the year 1999. For the out-patient, the beneficiaries were the total out-patient attendees and for the in-patient, it was the total pediatric admissions multiplied by mean duration of stay in days. RESULTS: The cost per out-patient visit was INR.20.2 (US0.44 dollars@1US dollars=INR.46) at primary level, higher than INR14.5 (US0.31 dollars) at the secondary level, while at tertiary level it was INR 33.8 (US 0.73 dollars). At the primary and secondary level, non-physician cost was more than the physician cost, and for tertiary level, physician cost was much higher than the other costs. There were no in-patient services at primary level. The cost of in-patient services at secondary level was estimated as INR 419.30 (US 9.1 dollars) per patient per day with a bed occupancy rate of 60%. Two-fifths of the cost was due to nursing and other supportive staff and one fifth due to the doctor costs and overhead costs. The unit cost of INR 928 (US 20.2 dollars) per patient per day incurred at AIIMS with a bed occupancy rate of 100% was almost twice that of secondary level. In contrast to the secondary level, almost half the total costs at tertiary level was due to the doctors costs. CONCLUSIONS: Effective use of resources at lower level of care especially ambulatory care at primary level and inpatient care at secondary level can result in much higher savings for the system and also, the society. These would need to be appropriately strengthened.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost of ambulatory (out-patient) and in-patient pediatric health services for the year 1999 provided by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) at all the three levels-primary, secondary and tertiary level. METHODS: The costing module developed by Children's Vaccines Initiative (CVI) was used. This rapid assessment tool focuses on collection of data at macro level by using key informants like doctors, nursing staff, accountant, store keeper, engineer etc. Cost per beneficiary was estimated separately for in-patients and out-patients and was calculated by dividing the total cost of the services by the number of beneficiaries for the year 1999. For the out-patient, the beneficiaries were the total out-patient attendees and for the in-patient, it was the total pediatric admissions multiplied by mean duration of stay in days. RESULTS: The cost per out-patient visit was INR.20.2 (US0.44 dollars@1US dollars=INR.46) at primary level, higher than INR14.5 (US0.31 dollars) at the secondary level, while at tertiary level it was INR 33.8 (US 0.73 dollars). At the primary and secondary level, non-physician cost was more than the physician cost, and for tertiary level, physician cost was much higher than the other costs. There were no in-patient services at primary level. The cost of in-patient services at secondary level was estimated as INR 419.30 (US 9.1 dollars) per patient per day with a bed occupancy rate of 60%. Two-fifths of the cost was due to nursing and other supportive staff and one fifth due to the doctor costs and overhead costs. The unit cost of INR 928 (US 20.2 dollars) per patient per day incurred at AIIMS with a bed occupancy rate of 100% was almost twice that of secondary level. In contrast to the secondary level, almost half the total costs at tertiary level was due to the doctors costs. CONCLUSIONS: Effective use of resources at lower level of care especially ambulatory care at primary level and inpatient care at secondary level can result in much higher savings for the system and also, the society. These would need to be appropriately strengthened.