Literature DB >> 16131628

Reconsidering substitution in long-term care: when does assistive technology take the place of personal care?

Emily M Agree1, Vicki A Freedman, Jennifer C Cornman, Douglas A Wolf, John E Marcotte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Assistive technology (AT) may improve quality of life and reduce dependence for older persons with disabilities. In this article, we examine tradeoffs between the use of AT and reliance on personal care, with attention to factors that may influence those relationships.
METHODS: We jointly modeled hours of formal and informal care with use of AT in order to address the interdependence of these outcomes in ways not taken into account in previous studies. We analyzed a national sample of older persons with difficulty in activities of daily living drawn from Phase 2 of the 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Disability Supplement.
RESULTS: Our findings show that the use of AT was associated with reductions in informal care hours, especially for those who were unmarried, better educated, or had better cognitive abilities, but appeared to supplement formal care services for these groups. Individuals with cognitive impairment were less likely than others to substitute AT with either type of personal care. DISCUSSION: These models raise the possibility that reductions of informal care hours may be accomplished with a combination of formal care and assistive devices, rather than from either alternative alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16131628     DOI: 10.1093/geronb/60.5.s272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  25 in total

1.  A quality-of-life scale for assistive technology: results of a pilot study of aging and technology.

Authors:  Emily M Agree; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-10-14

2.  Does fall history influence residential adjustments?

Authors:  Natalie Leland; Frank Porell; Susan L Murphy
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2010-11-03

Review 3.  The potential for technology to enhance independence for those aging with a disability.

Authors:  Emily M Agree
Journal:  Disabil Health J       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 2.554

4.  Activity limitations, use of assistive devices or personal help, and well-being: variation by education.

Authors:  I-Fen Lin; Hsueh-Sheng Wu
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  Needs of Stroke Survivors as Perceived by Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Shilpa Krishnan; Monique R Pappadis; Susan C Weller; Marsja Stearnes; Amit Kumar; Kenneth J Ottenbacher; Timothy A Reistetter
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.159

6.  Assistive technology use of older American Indians in a southeastern tribe: the native elder care study.

Authors:  R Turner Goins; S Melinda Spencer; Srikanth Goli; Joan C Rogers
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  The role of accommodations in poststroke disability management.

Authors:  Lesli E Skolarus; James F Burke; Vicki A Freedman
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  How Different Forms of Health Matter to Political Participation.

Authors:  Barry C Burden; Jason M Fletcher; Pamela Herd; Bradley M Jones; Donald P Moynihan
Journal:  J Polit       Date:  2016-11-02

9.  The inter-relationship between formal and informal care: a study in France and Israel.

Authors:  Howard Litwin; Claudine Attias-Donfut
Journal:  Ageing Soc       Date:  2009-01

10.  The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey on Disability (NHIS-D): A Bibliography of 20 Years of Research.

Authors:  Brian W Ward; Heather Ridolfo; Lauren Creamer; Caroline Gray
Journal:  Rev Disabil Stud       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.