Literature DB >> 16130583

Process evaluation of the New South Wales Walk Safely to School Day.

Dafna Merom1, Chris Rissel, Ajsa Mahmic, Adrian Bauman.   

Abstract

ISSUES ADDRESSED: Concerns about the contribution of lower physical activity by children on levels of childhood obesity have driven the search for interventions that encourage lifestyle physical activity by school-aged children.
METHOD: This paper describes the evaluation of the New South Wales (NSW) Walk Safely To School Day (WSTSD), an event repeated annually on the first Friday in April from 2001 to 2004. Paid media advertising before the event promoted WSTSD. All primary schools in NSW were invited to participate. The evaluation included monitoring of schools registering to participate over four years, and in 2002 evaluation feedback from schools as well as a population-based telephone survey of randomly selected parents of primary school-aged children.
RESULTS: By 2004, 53% of all primary schools in NSW had participated at least once in WSTSD and 15% had participated for at least three years. Participating schools linked WSTSD to road safety curricula, and 59% of schools also talked about WSTSD at school assemblies, but few (7%) organised walking-related activities. Parents reported that one-quarter (24%) of NSW primary school-aged students participated in WSTSD activities, including an additional 31% more children walking to school on WSTSD than would normally walk on a Friday.
CONCLUSION: Walk Safely To School Day resulted in a moderate short-term change in walking behaviour. High levels of in-principle support from parents indicate that greater participation in walking to school is possible, but will require stronger interventions to overcome the barriers identified by parents and to maintain changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16130583     DOI: 10.1071/he05100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Promot J Austr        ISSN: 1036-1073


  7 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of health branding: growth of a promising practice.

Authors:  W Douglas Evans; Jonathan Blitstein; Donna Vallone; Samantha Post; Wendy Nielsen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Effects of a school-based intervention on active commuting to school and health-related fitness.

Authors:  Emilio Villa-González; Jonatan R Ruiz; Jason A Mendoza; Palma Chillón
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Validity and reliability of a school travel survey.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Brian Neelon; Sarah C Ball; Amber Vaughn; Dianne S Ward
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2008

Review 4.  A systematic review of interventions for promoting active transportation to school.

Authors:  Palma Chillón; Kelly R Evenson; Amber Vaughn; Dianne S Ward
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 6.457

5.  Impact of an Australian state-wide active travel campaign targeting primary schools.

Authors:  Shannon Sahlqvist; Jenny Veitch; Gavin Abbott; Jo Salmon; Jan Garrard; Felix Acker; Kellye Hartman; Anna Timperio
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2019-04-05

Review 6.  How explicable are differences between reviews that appear to address a similar research question? A review of reviews of physical activity interventions.

Authors:  Jenny Woodman; James Thomas; Kelly Dickson
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2012-08-17

7.  A comparative case study on active transport to and from school.

Authors:  Carrie E Fesperman; Kelly R Evenson; Daniel A Rodríguez; David Salvesen
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.