BACKGROUND:Pain after amputation is common but difficult to treat, and few controlled treatment studies exist. METHODS: In the current study, 94 treatment-naive posttraumatic limb amputees with phantom pain (intensity: mean visual analog scale score [0-100], 40 [95% confidence interval, 38-41]) were randomly assigned to receive individually titrated doses of tramadol, placebo (double-blind comparison), or amitriptyline (open comparison) for 1 month. Nonresponders were crossed over to the alternative active treatment. RESULTS: After 1 month, phantom pain intensity was 1 (0-2) in the 48 tramadol responders (mean dose, 448 mg [95% confidence interval, 391-505 mg]), 0 (0-0) in the 40 amitriptyline responders (55 [50-59] mg), and 0 (0-0) in the 2 placebo responders, with similar effects on stump pain. Cytochrome P-450 2D6 slow metabolizers derived greater analgesia from tramadol and less from amitriptyline compared with fast metabolizers in the first treatment week (P < 0.01). Electrical pain thresholds increased and pain during suprathreshold stimulation decreased markedly on the stump and, to a lesser extent, on the contralateral limb after 1 month of treatment with amitriptyline or tramadol. Adverse effects were minor in all groups, but more common with tramadol. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naive patients, both amitriptyline and tramadol provided excellent and stable phantom limb and stump pain control with no major adverse events. Both drugs demonstrated consistent and large antinociceptive effects on both the stump and the intact limbs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Pain after amputation is common but difficult to treat, and few controlled treatment studies exist. METHODS: In the current study, 94 treatment-naive posttraumatic limb amputees with phantom pain (intensity: mean visual analog scale score [0-100], 40 [95% confidence interval, 38-41]) were randomly assigned to receive individually titrated doses of tramadol, placebo (double-blind comparison), or amitriptyline (open comparison) for 1 month. Nonresponders were crossed over to the alternative active treatment. RESULTS: After 1 month, phantom pain intensity was 1 (0-2) in the 48 tramadol responders (mean dose, 448 mg [95% confidence interval, 391-505 mg]), 0 (0-0) in the 40 amitriptyline responders (55 [50-59] mg), and 0 (0-0) in the 2 placebo responders, with similar effects on stump pain. Cytochrome P-450 2D6 slow metabolizers derived greater analgesia from tramadol and less from amitriptyline compared with fast metabolizers in the first treatment week (P < 0.01). Electrical pain thresholds increased and pain during suprathreshold stimulation decreased markedly on the stump and, to a lesser extent, on the contralateral limb after 1 month of treatment with amitriptyline or tramadol. Adverse effects were minor in all groups, but more common with tramadol. CONCLUSIONS: In treatment-naive patients, both amitriptyline and tramadol provided excellent and stable phantom limb and stump pain control with no major adverse events. Both drugs demonstrated consistent and large antinociceptive effects on both the stump and the intact limbs.
Authors: Christopher L Wu; Shefali Agarwal; Prabhav K Tella; Brendan Klick; Michael R Clark; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite; Mitchell B Max; Srinivasa N Raja Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.892