OBJECTIVE: To compare ethnic differences in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), assessed by computed tomography, and type 2 diabetes risk among 55- to 80-year-old Filipino, African-American, and white women without known cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects were participants in the Rancho Bernardo Study (n = 196), the Filipino Women's Health Study (n = 181), and the Health Assessment Study of African-American Women (n = 193). Glucose and anthropometric measurements were assessed between 1995 and 2002. RESULTS: African-American women had significantly higher age-adjusted BMI (29.7 kg/m(2)) and waist girth (88.1 cm) compared with Filipino (BMI, 25.5 kg/m(2); waist girth, 81.9 cm) or white (BMI: 26.0 kg/m(2); waist girth: 80.7 cm) women. However, VAT was significantly higher among Filipino (69.1 cm(3)) compared with white (62.3 cm(3); p = 0.037) or African-American (57.5 cm(3), p < 0.001) women. VAT correlated better with BMI (r = 0.69) and waist (r = 0.77) in whites, compared with Filipino (r = 0.42; r = 0.59) or African-American (r = 0.50; r = 0.56) women. Age-adjusted type 2 diabetes prevalence was significantly higher in Filipinas (32.1%) than in white (5.8%) or African-American (12.1%) women. Filipinas had higher type 2 diabetes risk compared with African Americans [adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 4.86] or whites (adjusted odds ratio, 7.51; 95% CI, 2.51 to 22.5) after adjusting for age, VAT, exercise, education, and alcohol intake. DISCUSSION: VAT was highest among Filipinas despite similar BMI and waist circumference as whites. BMI and waist circumference were weaker estimates of VAT in Filipino and African-American women than in whites. Type 2 diabetes prevalence was highest among Filipino women at every level of VAT, but VAT did not explain their elevated type 2 diabetes risk.
OBJECTIVE: To compare ethnic differences in visceral adipose tissue (VAT), assessed by computed tomography, and type 2 diabetes risk among 55- to 80-year-old Filipino, African-American, and white women without known cardiovascular disease. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Subjects were participants in the Rancho Bernardo Study (n = 196), the Filipino Women's Health Study (n = 181), and the Health Assessment Study of African-American Women (n = 193). Glucose and anthropometric measurements were assessed between 1995 and 2002. RESULTS: African-American women had significantly higher age-adjusted BMI (29.7 kg/m(2)) and waist girth (88.1 cm) compared with Filipino (BMI, 25.5 kg/m(2); waist girth, 81.9 cm) or white (BMI: 26.0 kg/m(2); waist girth: 80.7 cm) women. However, VAT was significantly higher among Filipino (69.1 cm(3)) compared with white (62.3 cm(3); p = 0.037) or African-American (57.5 cm(3), p < 0.001) women. VAT correlated better with BMI (r = 0.69) and waist (r = 0.77) in whites, compared with Filipino (r = 0.42; r = 0.59) or African-American (r = 0.50; r = 0.56) women. Age-adjusted type 2 diabetes prevalence was significantly higher in Filipinas (32.1%) than in white (5.8%) or African-American (12.1%) women. Filipinas had higher type 2 diabetes risk compared with African Americans [adjusted odds ratio, 2.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09 to 4.86] or whites (adjusted odds ratio, 7.51; 95% CI, 2.51 to 22.5) after adjusting for age, VAT, exercise, education, and alcohol intake. DISCUSSION: VAT was highest among Filipinas despite similar BMI and waist circumference as whites. BMI and waist circumference were weaker estimates of VAT in Filipino and African-American women than in whites. Type 2 diabetes prevalence was highest among Filipino women at every level of VAT, but VAT did not explain their elevated type 2 diabetes risk.
Authors: Latha P Palaniappan; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Themistocles L Assimes; Elizabeth L Barrett-Connor; Mercedes R Carnethon; Michael H Criqui; Gordon L Fung; K M Venkat Narayan; Hamang Patel; Ruth E Taylor-Piliae; Peter W F Wilson; Nathan D Wong Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-08-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ellen W Demerath; Nikki L Rogers; Derek Reed; Miryoung Lee; Audrey C Choh; Roger M Siervogel; Wm Cameron Chumlea; Bradford Towne; Stefan A Czerwinski Journal: Ann Hum Biol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 1.533
Authors: Maria Rosario G Araneta; Alka M Kanaya; William C Hsu; Healani K Chang; Andrew Grandinetti; Edward J Boyko; Tomoshige Hayashi; Steven E Kahn; Donna L Leonetti; Marguerite J McNeely; Yukiko Onishi; Kyoko K Sato; Wilfred Y Fujimoto Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-02-09 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Charlene A Wong; Maria Rosario G Araneta; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; John Alcaraz; Donna Castañeda; Carol Macera Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2007-08-30 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: Juhua Luo; Michael Hendryx; Deepika Laddu; Lawrence S Phillips; Rowan Chlebowski; Erin S LeBlanc; David B Allison; Dorothy A Nelson; Yueyao Li; Milagros C Rosal; Marcia L Stefanick; JoAnn E Manson Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 19.112