Literature DB >> 16129650

Contemporary mass spectrometry for the direct detection of enzyme intermediates.

Neil L Kelleher1, Leslie M Hicks.   

Abstract

The field of enzymology has long used small-molecule mass spectrometry. However, the direct interrogation of covalent and non-covalent intermediates by large-molecule mass spectrometry of enzymes or large peptide substrates is illuminating an increasingly diverse array of chemistries used in nature. Recent advances now allow improved detection of several modifications formed at sub-stoichiometric levels on the same polypeptide, and elucidation of intermediate dynamics with low millisecond temporal resolution. Highlighting recent applications in both ribosomal and non-ribosomal biosynthesis of natural products, along with acetyl transferases, sulfonucleotide reducatases, and PEP-utilizing enzymes, the utility of small- and large-molecule mass spectrometry to reveal enzyme intermediates and illuminate mechanism is described briefly. From ever more complex mixtures, mass spectrometry continues to evolve into a key technology for a larger number of today's enzymologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129650     DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.08.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol        ISSN: 1367-5931            Impact factor:   8.822


  6 in total

1.  Observation of a chemically labile, noncovalent enzyme intermediate in the reaction of metal-dependent Aquifex pyrophilus KDO8PS by time-resolved mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Anne Roberts; Cristina Furdui; Karen S Anderson
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Transfer of structural elements from compact to extended states in unsolvated ubiquitin.

Authors:  Stormy L Koeniger; Samuel I Merenbloom; Sundarapandian Sevugarajan; David E Clemmer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 3.  Nuclear ADP-ribosylation reactions in mammalian cells: where are we today and where are we going?

Authors:  Paul O Hassa; Sandra S Haenni; Michael Elser; Michael O Hottiger
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Direct quantitation of peptide mixtures without standards using clusters formed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ryan D Leib; Tawnya G Flick; Evan R Williams
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Accessing natural product biosynthetic processes by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Stefanie B Bumpus; Neil L Kelleher
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 6.  Cancer proteomics by quantitative shotgun proteomics.

Authors:  Emily I Chen; John R Yates
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.603

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.