Literature DB >> 16129598

European Union centralised procedure for marketing authorisation of oncology drugs: an in-depth review of its efficiency.

Tilo Netzer1.   

Abstract

In the European Union (EU) 20 anticancer agents have been successfully authorised via the Centralised Procedure since its implementation in 1995. Public information on these 20 agents has been reviewed in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the available regulatory mechanisms to facilitate the marketing authorisation of such drugs in the EU. These mechanisms include orphan drug legislation, exceptional circumstances provision and the accelerated evaluation procedure. Based on the fact that the EU orphan drug legislation was not implemented before the year 2000 no conclusions on its effectiveness to facilitate oncology drug development can be drawn today. Much more data are available on the effects of the exceptional circumstances provision, which was used in 6 out of 10 cases over the past four years. An analysis of the clinical data packages indicates that this provision allows authorisation of innovative oncology drugs based on smaller clinical data sets than required for full approval. The accelerated evaluation procedure was used in only one case and significantly reduced the scientific review time at the EU agencies. However, this mechanism does not influence the administrative time at the authorities, which accounted for almost one-third of the overall duration of the EU marketing authorisation procedures for oncology drugs. Revision of the EU drug legislation brings about some changes to the above-described provisions, with the potential for an improvement in the current situation. Thus, its implementation offers the chance to reduce the time that innovative oncology agents take to reach the market, although -- based on experience with the current procedures -- more effort is likely to be required to achieve this goal.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129598     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  7 in total

1.  Regulating medicines in Croatia: five-year experience of Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices.

Authors:  Sinisa Tomić; Anita Filipović Sucić; Ana Plazonić; Rajka Truban Zulj; Viola Macolić Sarinić; Branka Cudina; Adrijana Ilić Martinac
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.351

Review 2.  Market access of cancer drugs in European countries: improving resource allocation.

Authors:  Kim Pauwels; Isabelle Huys; Minne Casteels; Katelijne De Nys; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 3.  A fresh perspective on comparing the FDA and the CHMP/EMA: approval of antineoplastic tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Rashmi R Shah; Samantha A Roberts; Devron R Shah
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Haematological anticancer drugs in Europe: any added value at the time of approval?

Authors:  Vittorio Bertele'; Rita Banzi; Filippo Capasso; Giovanni Tafuri; Francesco Trotta; Giovanni Apolone; Silvio Garattini
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  Hurdles and delays in access to anti-cancer drugs in Europe.

Authors:  F Ades; D Zardavas; C Senterre; E de Azambuja; A Eniu; R Popescu; M Piccart; F Parent
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2014-11-17

6.  How do we avoid disaster when exiting the European Medicines Agency? Making the most of Brexit in pharmaceutical regulation.

Authors:  Anthony James Hatswell
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2017-06-27

7.  Regulatory approval of pharmaceuticals without a randomised controlled study: analysis of EMA and FDA approvals 1999-2014.

Authors:  Anthony J Hatswell; Gianluca Baio; Jesse A Berlin; Alar Irs; Nick Freemantle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.