Literature DB >> 16129508

Physician workload in primary care: what is the optimal size of practices? A cross-sectional study.

Michel Wensing1, Pieter van den Hombergh, Reinier Akkermans, Jan van Doremalen, Richard Grol.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of practice size and scope of services on average physician workload in primary care practices in The Netherlands, and to examine the associations between average physician workload, average assistant volume and organisational practice characteristics.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study in 1188 general practices in The Netherlands. Measures included physician workload per week per 1000 patients, assistant volume per 1000 patients, practice size defined by number of registered patients (10 classes), scope of disease management services (seven classes), and nine organisational characteristics of the practice.
RESULTS: Physician workload per 1000 patients differed across levels of practice size, but was not related with the range of disease management services provided. In the smallest practices physicians worked on average 26.2h per 1000 patients and in the largest practices 18.1h. A higher average assistant volume was overall not associated with a lower average physician workload. Large practices had lower assistant volume per 1000 patients, but provided a wider range of disease management services compared to small practices. Delegation of medical tasks was associated with reduced physician workload per 1000 patients, mainly in smaller practices, and with higher assistant volume per 1000 patients, particularly in larger practices.
CONCLUSIONS: In The Netherlands the optimum regarding average physician workload was found in the largest practices, while no obvious association with scope of disease management services appeared. It may be that in large practices medical tasks were delegated to practice assistants to provide a wider scope of disease management services and in small practice to reduce average physician workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129508     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.07.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  12 in total

1.  Organisational determinants of production and efficiency in general practice: a population-based study.

Authors:  Kim Rose Olsen; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Torben Højmark Sørensen; Troels Kristensen; Peter Vedsted; Andrew Street
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-12-06

Review 2.  Does practice size matter? Review of effects on quality of care in primary care.

Authors:  Charis Wei Ling Ng; Kok Ping Ng
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Is 'practice size' the key to quality of care?

Authors:  Pieter van den Hombergh; Stephen Campbell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Primary care characteristics and population-orientated health care across Europe: an observational study.

Authors:  Jan van Lieshout; Margalith Goldfracht; Stephen Campbell; Sabine Ludt; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Patient- and provider-related determinants of generic and specific health-related quality of life of patients with chronic systolic heart failure in primary care: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Frank Peters-Klimm; Cornelia U Kunz; Gunter Laux; Joachim Szecsenyi; Thomas Müller-Tasch
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Improvement of primary care for patients with chronic heart failure: a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial comparing two strategies.

Authors:  Jan van Lieshout; Betty Steenkamer; Marjan Knippenberg; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Is the job satisfaction of primary care team members associated with patient satisfaction?

Authors:  Joachim Szecsenyi; Katja Goetz; Stephen Campbell; Bjoern Broge; Bernd Reuschenbach; Michel Wensing
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Barriers to cardiovascular risk prevention and management in Germany--an analysis of the EURIKA study.

Authors:  Roland E Schmieder; Matthias Goebel; Peter Bramlage
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2012-03-15

9.  The Association Between Panel Size and Health Outcomes of Patients with Hypertension in Urban China: a Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Rize Jing; Elham Mahmoudi; Xiaozhen Lai; Haijun Zhang; Hai Fang
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Effectiveness and efficiency of a practice accreditation program on cardiovascular risk management in primary care: study protocol of a clustered randomized trial.

Authors:  Elvira Nouwens; Jan Van Lieshout; Eddy Adang; Margriet Bouma; Jozé Braspenning; Michel Wensing
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.