Literature DB >> 16129365

Myeloablative megatherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue versus oral maintenance chemotherapy as consolidation treatment in patients with high-risk neuroblastoma: a randomised controlled trial.

Frank Berthold1, Joachim Boos, Stefan Burdach, Rudolf Erttmann, Günter Henze, Johann Hermann, Thomas Klingebiel, Bernhard Kremens, Freimut H Schilling, Martin Schrappe, Thorsten Simon, Barbara Hero.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myeloablative megatherapy is commonly used to improve the poor outlook of children with high-risk neuroblastoma, yet its role is poorly defined. We aimed to assess whether megatherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation could increase event-free survival and overall survival compared with maintenance chemotherapy.
METHODS: 295 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma (ie, patients with stage 4 disease aged older than 1 year or those with MYCN-amplified tumours and stage 1, 2, 3, or 4S disease or stage 4 disease and <1 year old) were randomly assigned to myeloablative megatherapy (melphalan, etoposide, and carboplatin) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (n=149) or to oral maintenance chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (n=146). The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and the number of treatment-related deaths. Analyses were done by intent to treat, as treated, and treated as randomised.
FINDINGS: Intention-to-treat analysis showed that patients allocated megatherapy had increased 3-year event-free survival compared with those allocated maintenance therapy (47% [95% CI 38-55] vs 31% [95% CI 23-39]; hazard ratio 1.404 [95% CI 1.048-1.881], p=0.0221), but did not have significantly increased 3-year overall survival (62% [95% CI 54-70] vs 53% [95% CI 45-62]; 1.329 [0.958-1.843], p=0.0875). Improved 3-year event-free survival and 3-year overall survival were also recorded for patients given megatherapy in the as-treated group (n=212) and in the treated-as-randomised group (n=145). Two patients died from therapy-related complications during induction treatment. No patients given maintenance therapy died from acute treatment-related toxic effects. Five patients given megatherapy died from acute complications related to megatherapy.
INTERPRETATION: Myeloablative chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation improves the outcome for children with high-risk neuroblastoma despite the raised risk of treatment-associated death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129365     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70291-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  118 in total

1.  Anti-GD2 Strategy in the Treatment of Neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Richard K Yang; Paul M Sondel
Journal:  Drugs Future       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.148

Review 2.  Secondary malignancies following high dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation-systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  I Vaxman; R Ram; A Gafter-Gvili; L Vidal; M Yeshurun; M Lahav; O Shpilberg
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Stem cell transplantation for neuroblastoma.

Authors:  J D Fish; S A Grupp
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Pilot induction regimen incorporating pharmacokinetically guided topotecan for treatment of newly diagnosed high-risk neuroblastoma: a Children's Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Julie R Park; Jeffrey R Scott; Clinton F Stewart; Wendy B London; Arlene Naranjo; Victor M Santana; Peter J Shaw; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Long-term results for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated on a randomized trial of myeloablative therapy followed by 13-cis-retinoic acid: a children's oncology group study.

Authors:  Katherine K Matthay; C Patrick Reynolds; Robert C Seeger; Hiroyuki Shimada; E Stanton Adkins; Daphne Haas-Kogan; Robert B Gerbing; Wendy B London; Judith G Villablanca
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Incidence and risk factors for secondary malignancy in patients with neuroblastoma after treatment with (131)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine.

Authors:  Kelly E Huibregtse; Kieuhoa T Vo; Steven G DuBois; Stephanie Fetzko; John Neuhaus; Vandana Batra; John M Maris; Brian Weiss; Araz Marachelian; Greg A Yanik; Katherine K Matthay
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2016-08-27       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Topotecan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (TCE) in the treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma. Results of a phase-II trial.

Authors:  Thorsten Simon; Alfred Längler; Urs Harnischmacher; Michael C Frühwald; Norbert Jorch; Alexander Claviez; Frank Berthold; Barbara Hero
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Surgical treatment of neuroblastoma: twenty-three years of experience at a single institution.

Authors:  A I Koivusalo; M P Pakarinen; R J Rintala; U M Saarinen-Pihkala
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Management and outcome of stage 3 neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Shakeel Modak; Brian H Kushner; Michael P LaQuaglia; Kim Kramer; Nai-Kong V Cheung
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  Genetic discoveries and treatment advances in neuroblastoma.

Authors:  Rochelle Bagatell; Susan L Cohn
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.856

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.