Literature DB >> 16129131

User charges and priority setting in health care: balancing equity and efficiency.

Peter C Smith1.   

Abstract

User charges are the major source of finance for many health care systems. However, traditional approaches to health care priority setting, such as cost-effectiveness analysis, usually assume there are no user charges and therefore may ignore important implications for equity and efficiency. This paper therefore develops a rudimentary model of priority setting in which the fixed health care budget can be augmented by user charges. The paper uses methods analogous to models of optimal commodity taxation to develop a set of rules for the inclusion of a health technology in the subsidized health care package, and the calculation of its associated copayment rate. The results indicate that optimal levels of subsidy depend on the cost-effectiveness of the intervention, its price elasticity of demand, the epidemiology of the associated disease, and the policy maker's attitude towards equity. The model has important implications for policy making in three domains: health care priority setting, evaluation of health care technologies, and charging policy.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129131     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  6 in total

Review 1.  Empirical models of demand for out-patient physician services and their relevance to the assessment of patient payment policies: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Olga Skriabikova; Milena Pavlova; Wim Groot
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Towards improved measurement of financial protection in health.

Authors:  Rodrigo Moreno-Serra; Christopher Millett; Peter C Smith
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  Out-of-pocket payments, vertical equity and unmet medical needs in France: A national multicenter prospective study on lymphedema.

Authors:  Gregoire Mercier; Jenica Pastor; Valerie Clément; Ulysse Rodts; Christine Moffat; Isabelle Quéré
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Private costs almost equal health care costs when intervening in mild Alzheimer's: a cohort study alongside the DAISY trial.

Authors:  Rikke Søgaard; Jan Sørensen; Frans B Waldorff; Ane Eckermann; Dorthe V Buss; Gunhild Waldemar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Squaring the cube: Towards an operational model of optimal universal health coverage.

Authors:  Jessica Ochalek; Gerald Manthalu; Peter C Smith
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Guidance on priority setting in health care (GPS-Health): the inclusion of equity criteria not captured by cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Ole F Norheim; Rob Baltussen; Mira Johri; Dan Chisholm; Erik Nord; DanW Brock; Per Carlsson; Richard Cookson; Norman Daniels; Marion Danis; Marc Fleurbaey; Kjell A Johansson; Lydia Kapiriri; Peter Littlejohns; Thomas Mbeeli; Krishna D Rao; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Dan Wikler
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2014-08-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.