AIM: To investigate the effect of professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) on the prevention of periodontal diseases. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies from 1950 to October 2004. Screening and data abstraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. Critical appraisal of studies was based on objective criteria and evidence tables were constructed. RESULTS: From 2179 titles and abstracts, 132 full-text articles were screened and 32 studies were relevant. Evidence exists that PMPR in adults, particularly in combination with oral hygiene instruction (OHI), may be more effective than no treatment judged by surrogate measures. The evidence for a benefit of PMPR+OHI over OHI alone is less clear. The optimum frequency of PMPR has not been investigated although more frequent PMPR is associated with improved markers of health. The strength of evidence for these results ranges from weak to moderate due to risk of bias, inconsistent results, lack of appropriate statistics and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be little value in providing PMPR without OHI. In fact, repeated OHI might have a similar effect as PMPR. Some forms of PMPR might achieve greater patient satisfaction. There is little difference in beneficial or adverse effects of different methods of PMPR.
AIM: To investigate the effect of professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) on the prevention of periodontal diseases. METHODS: We searched for randomized controlled trials, controlled clinical trials and cohort studies from 1950 to October 2004. Screening and data abstraction were conducted independently and in duplicate. Critical appraisal of studies was based on objective criteria and evidence tables were constructed. RESULTS: From 2179 titles and abstracts, 132 full-text articles were screened and 32 studies were relevant. Evidence exists that PMPR in adults, particularly in combination with oral hygiene instruction (OHI), may be more effective than no treatment judged by surrogate measures. The evidence for a benefit of PMPR+OHI over OHI alone is less clear. The optimum frequency of PMPR has not been investigated although more frequent PMPR is associated with improved markers of health. The strength of evidence for these results ranges from weak to moderate due to risk of bias, inconsistent results, lack of appropriate statistics and small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: There appears to be little value in providing PMPR without OHI. In fact, repeated OHI might have a similar effect as PMPR. Some forms of PMPR might achieve greater patient satisfaction. There is little difference in beneficial or adverse effects of different methods of PMPR.
Authors: Attila Horváth; Nikos Mardas; Luis André Mezzomo; Ian G Needleman; Nikos Donos Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Martina Albrecht; Florian Isenbeck; Jüürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser; Anke Steckelberg Journal: Dtsch Arztebl Int Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 5.594
Authors: Tina Poklepovic Pericic; Helen V Worthington; Trevor M Johnson; Dario Sambunjak; Pauline Imai; Janet E Clarkson; Peter Tugwell Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-24
Authors: Clare L Jones; Keith M Milsom; Philip Ratcliffe; Annette Wyllie; Tatiana V Macfarlane; Martin Tickle Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 2.757