AIMS: To investigate associations, including non-linear relationships, between cognitive function and alcohol consumption, testing for moderating effects of age and gender and for differences across outcome measures. Design Cross-sectional general population samples of three age cohorts. Setting Canberra and Queanbeyan, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The total sample of 7485 consisted of 2404 men and women aged 20-24 years, 2530 aged 40-44 years, and 2551 aged 60-64 years, selected from the electoral rolls. Measurements Self-report data using hand-held computers provided weekly alcohol consumption from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) frequency, quantity and binge-drinking items, and socio-demographic factors. Spot-the-Word, digits backwards, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), immediate recall and reaction-time tests were conducted by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Findings varied across dependent variables, but there was a general tendency for light drinkers (up to 20/10 g alcohol per day in men/women, respectively) to perform better than abstainers, occasional drinkers or those drinking at hazardous/harmful levels (>40/20 g per day in men/women). Poorer performance of hazardous/harmful drinkers was seen only in men, whereas that of abstainers was evident in both sexes but was stronger in women. After adjustment for education and race, male hazardous/harmful drinkers no longer performed significantly less well than light drinkers, whereas male and female abstainers and occasional drinkers still did so. CONCLUSIONS: Abstainers have poorer cognitive function than light drinkers and further investigation is needed to determine what factors contribute to this.
AIMS: To investigate associations, including non-linear relationships, between cognitive function and alcohol consumption, testing for moderating effects of age and gender and for differences across outcome measures. Design Cross-sectional general population samples of three age cohorts. Setting Canberra and Queanbeyan, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: The total sample of 7485 consisted of 2404 men and women aged 20-24 years, 2530 aged 40-44 years, and 2551 aged 60-64 years, selected from the electoral rolls. Measurements Self-report data using hand-held computers provided weekly alcohol consumption from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) frequency, quantity and binge-drinking items, and socio-demographic factors. Spot-the-Word, digits backwards, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), immediate recall and reaction-time tests were conducted by trained interviewers. FINDINGS: Findings varied across dependent variables, but there was a general tendency for light drinkers (up to 20/10 g alcohol per day in men/women, respectively) to perform better than abstainers, occasional drinkers or those drinking at hazardous/harmful levels (>40/20 g per day in men/women). Poorer performance of hazardous/harmful drinkers was seen only in men, whereas that of abstainers was evident in both sexes but was stronger in women. After adjustment for education and race, male hazardous/harmful drinkers no longer performed significantly less well than light drinkers, whereas male and female abstainers and occasional drinkers still did so. CONCLUSIONS: Abstainers have poorer cognitive function than light drinkers and further investigation is needed to determine what factors contribute to this.
Authors: Rowan Saloner; Emily W Paolillo; Anya Umlauf; David J Moore; Robert K Heaton; Igor Grant; Mariana Cherner Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Faika Zanjani; Brian G Downer; Tina M Kruger; Sherry L Willis; K Warner Schaie Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2012-08-30 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Mary C Tierney; Gary Naglie; Ross Upshur; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Rahim Moineddin; Jocelyn Charles; Mary Ganguli Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2014 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Alden L Gross; George W Rebok; Daniel E Ford; Audrey Y Chu; Joseph J Gallo; Kung-Yee Liang; Lucy A Meoni; Hasan M Shihab; Nae-Yuh Wang; Michael J Klag Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2010-10-11 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Karen A Mather; Anthony F Jorm; Kaarin J Anstey; Peter J Milburn; Simon Easteal; Helen Christensen Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: May A Beydoun; Alyssa A Gamaldo; Hind A Beydoun; Toshiko Tanaka; Katherine L Tucker; Sameera A Talegawkar; Luigi Ferrucci; Alan B Zonderman Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-04-17 Impact factor: 4.798