Pamela Whitten1, Gary Doolittle, Michael Mackert. 1. Department of Communications, Purdue University, Beering Hall Rm. 2114, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2098, USA. pwhitten@purdue.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This research was conducted as part of a telehospice study conducted by researchers at Michigan State University, in a partnership with Hospice of Michigan. The study took place from March 2000 through December 2002. OBJECTIVE: One of the primary objectives of the study was to learn more about how providers feel about the provision of telemedicine services, in this case telehospice. Of particular importance was learning more about how providers' perceptions of services could change over the course of the project as they became more familiar and comfortable with providing telehospice services. Finally, researchers were interested in how the providers' perceptions of telehospice system might influence utilization. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Four Hospice of Michigan offices took part in this telehospice study, two in rural areas and two in urban settings with a total of 187 patients receiving telehospice care. Health providers who offered telehospice services were recruited to share information about their perceptions of the technology. MEASUREMENTS: Providers were surveyed at the beginning and end of the project to track their perceptions of telehospice services. Five focus groups with providers were also conducted over the course of the project to allow providers to elaborate their thoughts and perceptions in greater detail. RESULTS: Actual utilization of the telehospice system did not have a significant impact on perceptions of services; for the most part, providers began the project with pre-conceived notions about the technology and these perceptions held over the course of the project. Even providers who praised the level of training and technical support and who were able to cite success stories did not display a significant change in attitudes toward telehospice. Providers did express concern regarding how telehospice would impact current aspects of their job such as autonomy or mileage reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that providers serve as gatekeepers to a new technology and manner of providing care. Telehospice services in this project were primarily provided by a handful of enthusiastic adopters. The results of this study provide important implications if telehospice care is to disseminate for general use among hospice recipients.
BACKGROUND: This research was conducted as part of a telehospice study conducted by researchers at Michigan State University, in a partnership with Hospice of Michigan. The study took place from March 2000 through December 2002. OBJECTIVE: One of the primary objectives of the study was to learn more about how providers feel about the provision of telemedicine services, in this case telehospice. Of particular importance was learning more about how providers' perceptions of services could change over the course of the project as they became more familiar and comfortable with providing telehospice services. Finally, researchers were interested in how the providers' perceptions of telehospice system might influence utilization. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Four Hospice of Michigan offices took part in this telehospice study, two in rural areas and two in urban settings with a total of 187 patients receiving telehospice care. Health providers who offered telehospice services were recruited to share information about their perceptions of the technology. MEASUREMENTS: Providers were surveyed at the beginning and end of the project to track their perceptions of telehospice services. Five focus groups with providers were also conducted over the course of the project to allow providers to elaborate their thoughts and perceptions in greater detail. RESULTS: Actual utilization of the telehospice system did not have a significant impact on perceptions of services; for the most part, providers began the project with pre-conceived notions about the technology and these perceptions held over the course of the project. Even providers who praised the level of training and technical support and who were able to cite success stories did not display a significant change in attitudes toward telehospice. Providers did express concern regarding how telehospice would impact current aspects of their job such as autonomy or mileage reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Study results indicate that providers serve as gatekeepers to a new technology and manner of providing care. Telehospice services in this project were primarily provided by a handful of enthusiastic adopters. The results of this study provide important implications if telehospice care is to disseminate for general use among hospice recipients.
Authors: Maria A Woodward; Patricia Ple-Plakon; Taylor Blachley; David C Musch; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Lindsey B De Lott; Paul P Lee Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Lindsey B De Lott; Paula Anne Newman-Casey; Paul P Lee; Dena Ballouz; Lyna Azzouz; Juno Cho; Autumn N Valicevic; Maria A Woodward Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Natalie K Bradford; Jeanine Young; Nigel R Armfield; Anthony Herbert; Anthony C Smith Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 3.234