Literature DB >> 16127754

Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the post-MRCP era: a tertiary center experience.

Tze-Zen Ong1, Jen-Lock Khor, Dede-Sutedja Selamat, Khay-Guan Yeoh, Khek-Yu Ho.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate our experience in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) in terms of fulfilling the ASGE guidelines in indications, positive findings, and complications in the post-magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) era.
METHODS: Between November 2001 and February 2003, consecutive ERCP cases were prospectively evaluated with regard to the indications, findings, cannulation techniques, devices used during the procedure, sedation given, duration of procedure, and complications. These data were entered in a database for subsequent processing and analysis.
RESULTS: Of 336 cases, 21.4% were diagnostic and 78.6% therapeutic ERCP. The indications for ERCP fulfilled the ASGE guidelines in 323 cases (96.1%). Suspected bile duct stone was the most frequent indication (26.8%), and this was followed by cholangitis (24.4%), dilated common bile duct (14.9%), and cholestatic jaundice (13.4%). Cannulation success rate was 94%. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in 175 (52.1%) patients. Repeated ERCP was performed on 31.5% of the patients. Overall, the complication rate was 9.8% with 0.3% being procedure-related mortality. The complications were pancreatitis (5.4%), bleeding (0.8%), cholangitis (2.4%) and others (1.5%). No significant difference was observed between the complication rate and the type of ERCP performed.
CONCLUSION: Our study showed that post-ERCP complication rate was comparable with the other large prospective studies and there was no difference in the complication between the diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16127754      PMCID: PMC4320397          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i33.5209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  22 in total

1.  Principles of training in gastrointestinal endoscopy. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Standards of Training Committees. 1989-1990.

Authors:  J A Vennes; M Ament; H W Boyce; P B Cotton; D M Jensen; W J Ravich; C Sugawa; W C Wu; R A Sanowski; M Ament
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 2.  Complications related to diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  G Aliperti
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  1996-04

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D Vaira; L D'Anna; C Ainley; J Dowsett; S Williams; J Baillie; S Cairns; J Croker; P Salmon; P Cotton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-08-19       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a general surgery practice.

Authors:  D E Scheeres; I Simon; J L Ponsky
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of vater: a preliminary report.

Authors:  W S McCune; P E Shorb; H Moscovitz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Complications of fiberoptic gastrointestinal endoscopy--five years' experience in a central hospital.

Authors:  O Reiertsen; J Skjøtø; C D Jacobsen; A R Rosseland
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre.

Authors:  T Leese; J P Neoptolemos; D L Carr-Locke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Post-ERCP pancreatitis: association with urographic visualization during ERCP.

Authors:  M H Roszler; W L Campbell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Management of clinically relevant bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  J Boujaoudé; G Pelletier; J Fritsch; A Choury; J F Lefebvre; A Roche; C Frouge; C Liguory; J P Etienne
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.093

10.  Endoscopic treatment of biliary-tract diseases. An international study.

Authors:  L Safrany
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-11-04       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  13 in total

1.  Advanced cytologic techniques for the detection of malignant pancreatobiliary strictures.

Authors:  Laura E Moreno Luna; Benjamin Kipp; Kevin C Halling; Thomas J Sebo; Walter K Kremers; Lewis R Roberts; Emily G Barr Fritcher; Michael J Levy; Gregory J Gores
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: a case-control study comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for a "laparoscopy-first" attitude with the outcome for sequential treatment (systematic endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).

Authors:  Renato Costi; Antonio Mazzeo; Francesco Tartamella; Christine Manceau; Bernard Vacher; Alain Valverde
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

Authors:  A Sharma; P Dahiya; R Khullar; V Soni; M Baijal; P K Chowbey
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Comparative performance of non-contrast MRI with HASTE vs. contrast-enhanced MRI/3D-MRCP for possible choledocholithiasis in hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Stella K Kang; Laura Heacock; Ankur M Doshi; Justin R Ream; Jeffrey Sun; James S Babb
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-06

5.  Impact of Preoperative ERCP on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Case-Controlled Study with Propensity Score Matching.

Authors:  Keun Soo Ahn; Yong Hoon Kim; Koo Jeong Kang; Tae-Seok Kim; Kwang Bum Cho; Eun Soo Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) with or without stenting-complications, re-stent rate and a new risk stratification score.

Authors:  C R Tapping; O R Byass; J E I Cast
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Marilee-L Freitas; Robert-L Bell; Andrew-J Duffy
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Use of carbon dioxide as negative contrast agent for magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Chen; Yi-Sheng Liu; Chiung-Yu Chen; Hong-Ming Tsai; Shu-Chen Chen; Ming-Tsung Chuang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-28

Review 9.  Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy.

Authors:  Renato Costi; Alessandro Gnocchi; Francesco Di Mario; Leopoldo Sarli
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Results of Medium Seventeen Years' Follow-Up after Laparoscopic Choledochotomy for Ductal Stones.

Authors:  Silvia Quaresima; Andrea Balla; Mario Guerrieri; Giovanni Lezoche; Roberto Campagnacci; Giancarlo D'Ambrosio; Emanuele Lezoche; Alessandro M Paganini
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-03       Impact factor: 2.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.