Literature DB >> 16126316

Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit.

Christine McCourt1.   

Abstract

This study focused on patterns of communication between midwives and pregnant women and their implications for information, choice and control as now advocated in UK government policy. An earlier casenote audit evaluation of a new organisation of maternity care where midwives carry a personal caseload indicated no difference in quality standards of midwifery care from conventional care, yet women using the service gave a different view. In order to understand whether this difference might be an artefact of the research, responses to change, or a reflection of the limitations of using casenotes for research, an observation-based study was conducted. Forty interviews were observed in three UK settings: hospital clinic, GP clinic and women's homes. Interviews were tape-recorded and notes and drawings of interaction made. The transcripts were analysed using structured and qualitative approaches. The interactional patterns differed according to model of care i.e. conventional or caseload, and setting of care. Several key 'tasks' in the visits were noted, with risk screening and health education information being dominant in conventional care. A continuum of styles of communication was identified, with the prevalent styles also differing according to location and organisation of care. The hierarchical and formal styles discussed in earlier sociological work were the most common in conventional care, despite the focus of midwifery on being 'with-woman' and the recent policy emphasis on consumer choice. The caseload visits showed a less hierarchical and more conversational form and supported women's reports that this model of care offered them greater information, choice and control. The variation in patterns suggests that context is an important consideration in research of this type, with environment (both micro- and macro-level) and organisation of care influencing the ways in which the concepts of choice or consumerism operate in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16126316     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  13 in total

1.  Information giving and education in pregnancy: a review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Mary L Nolan
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2009

2.  Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Laura B Attanasio; Y Tony Yang; Melissa D Avery; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-07

3.  Engagement: an indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.

Authors:  Angie Docherty; Carol Bugge; Andrew Watterson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Standards and stories: the interactional work of informed choice in Ontario midwifery care.

Authors:  Philippa Spoel; Pamela McKenzie; Susan James; Jessica Hobberlin
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2013-10

5.  Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark.

Authors:  Viola Burau; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Antenatal care for alcohol consumption during pregnancy: pregnant women's reported receipt of care and associated characteristics.

Authors:  Emma Doherty; John Wiggers; Luke Wolfenden; Amy E Anderson; Kristy Crooks; Tracey W Tsang; Elizabeth J Elliott; Adrian J Dunlop; John Attia; Julia Dray; Belinda Tully; Nicole Bennett; Henry Murray; Carol Azzopardi; Melanie Kingsland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Midwives' perceptions of being 'with woman': a phenomenological study.

Authors:  Zoe Bradfield; Yvonne Hauck; Ravani Duggan; Michelle Kelly
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Strengthening Antenatal Care towards a Salutogenic Approach: A Meta-Ethnography.

Authors:  Kristiina Heinonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Obstetric and psychosocial risk factors for Australian-born and non-Australian born women and associated pregnancy and birth outcomes: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Hannah Grace Dahlen; Bryanne Barnett; Jane Kohlhoff; Maya Elizabeth Drum; Ana Maria Munoz; Charlene Thornton
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Women's experiences of decision-making and informed choice about pregnancy and birth care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Cassandra Yuill; Christine McCourt; Helen Cheyne; Nathalie Leister
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.