Literature DB >> 16125239

The evolving theory of basal forebrain functional-anatomical 'macrosystems'.

Daniel S Zahm1.   

Abstract

The conceptual basis and continuing development of Alheid and Heimer's [Alheid, G.F., Heimer, L., 1988. New perspectives in basal forebrain organization of special relevance for neuropsychiatric disorders: the striatopallidal, amygdaloid and corticopetal components of substantia innominata. Neuroscience 27, 1-39] theory of basal forebrain organization based on the description of basal forebrain functional-anatomical 'macrosytems' is reviewed. It is posed that the macrosystem theory leads to a hypothesis that different macrosystems cooperate and compete to exert distinct influences on motor and cognitive function. Emergent corollaries include, e.g. that the organization of the outputs of different macrosystems should differ. Consistent with these considerations, extant literature and some unpublished data indicate that the input nuclei of macrosystems are not abundantly interconnected and macrosystems systems have distinct neuroanatomical relationships with basal forebrain and brainstem cholinergic and dopaminergic ascending modulatory systems. Furthermore, macrosystem outputs appear to be directed almost exclusively at the reticular formation or structures intimately associated with it. The relative merits of the theory of functional-anatomical macrosystems are discussed in relation to Swanson's model of cerebral hemisphere control of motivated behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16125239     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  46 in total

1.  What and when to "want"? Amygdala-based focusing of incentive salience upon sugar and sex.

Authors:  Stephen V Mahler; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  On lateral septum-like characteristics of outputs from the accumbal hedonic "hotspot" of Peciña and Berridge with commentary on the transitional nature of basal forebrain "boundaries".

Authors:  Daniel S Zahm; Kenneth P Parsley; Zachary M Schwartz; Anita Y Cheng
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Metabotropic glutamate receptor blockade in nucleus accumbens shell shifts affective valence towards fear and disgust.

Authors:  Jocelyn M Richard; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  The dopaminergic projection system, basal forebrain macrosystems, and conditioned stimuli.

Authors:  Daniel S Zahm; Michael Trimble
Journal:  CNS Spectr       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.790

5.  Dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in the nucleus accumbens core and shell mediate Pavlovian-instrumental transfer.

Authors:  Anja Lex; Wolfgang Hauber
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 6.  'Liking' and 'wanting' food rewards: brain substrates and roles in eating disorders.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2009-03-29

7.  Lateral preoptic and ventral pallidal roles in locomotion and other movements.

Authors:  Suriya Subramanian; Rhett A Reichard; Hunter S Stevenson; Zachary M Schwartz; Kenneth P Parsley; Daniel S Zahm
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.270

8.  The mesopontine rostromedial tegmental nucleus: A structure targeted by the lateral habenula that projects to the ventral tegmental area of Tsai and substantia nigra compacta.

Authors:  Thomas C Jhou; Stefanie Geisler; Michela Marinelli; Beth A Degarmo; Daniel S Zahm
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 9.  The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Ventral pallidum roles in reward and motivation.

Authors:  Kyle S Smith; Amy J Tindell; J Wayne Aldridge; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.