Literature DB >> 16124844

Acceptance of HIV antibody testing among inpatients and outpatients at a public health hospital: a study of rapid versus standard testing.

Alysse Wurcel1, Tauheed Zaman, Susan Zhen, David Stone.   

Abstract

Patients of unknown HIV status who were admitted to the inpatient unit or who were undergoing evaluation in the outpatient clinic of a public health hospital were randomized to receive either the standard HIV test or a rapid HIV test. Patients ranged from 21-71 years of age, and 71% were male. Eleven percent were Hispanic, 36% black, and 48% Caucasian. 35% were injection drug users (IVDU) and 3% men who have sex with men (MSM). The waiting period for the standard test was 2 weeks, and that for rapid testing was approximately 20 minutes. Patients were provided with a telephone number and told to call and schedule a follow-up appointment to receive their standard test results. We found no statistical difference in the acceptance rates of either testing modality overall or with respect to age or gender. We did find a significantly greater percentage of Hispanic patients accepting rapid testing over standard testing (p = 0.04). The overall acceptance rates of rapid and standard testing were 60% and 41%, respectively. This was far lower than expected, and was due in part to the 40% of patients who refused testing because of their having a previous HIV test. All patients who had received previous testing had tested HIV negative, and we did not discover any new cases of HIV in the 103 patients tested during the study. Of those we tested, 95% of those receiving the rapid test and 43% of those receiving the standard test were informed of their status (p < 0.001). Failure of patients to return for follow-up visits accounts for the low percentage of individuals successfully informed of their standard test results. The study suggests that rapid HIV testing is at least as palatable as standard testing in our population. In addition, a far greater percentage of patients are informed of their status using the rapid HIV test. HIV testing programs at our hospital may not be cost effective as our population appears to have been heavily tested previously. Prior to initiating an HIV testing program within a hospital setting, it is imperative to determine the percentage of patients previously tested for HIV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16124844     DOI: 10.1089/apc.2005.19.499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS        ISSN: 1087-2914            Impact factor:   5.078


  17 in total

1.  Assessment of HIV testing of urban injection drug users: implications for expansion of HIV testing and prevention efforts.

Authors:  Robert Heimer; Lauretta E Grau; Erin Curtin; Kaveh Khoshnood; Merrill Singer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The utilization of testing and counseling for HIV: a review of the social and behavioral evidence.

Authors:  Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer; Michelle Osborn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Implications and impact of the new US Centers for Disease Control and prevention HIV testing guidelines.

Authors:  Jennifer C Millen; Christian Arbelaez; Rochelle P Walensky
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.725

4.  Feasibility and acceptability of door-to-door rapid HIV testing among latino immigrants and their HIV risk factors in North Carolina.

Authors:  Arlene C Seña; Juliana P Hammer; Kate Wilson; Abigail Zeveloff; Julia Gamble
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  Evaluation of an HIV nucleic acid testing program with automated Internet and voicemail systems to deliver results.

Authors:  Sheldon R Morris; Susan J Little; Terry Cunningham; Richard S Garfein; Douglas D Richman; Davey M Smith
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Is self-perceived HIV risk congruent with reported HIV risk among traditionally lower HIV risk and prevalence adult emergency department patients? Implications for HIV testing.

Authors:  Kimberly Pringle; Roland C Merchant; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.078

7.  Scope of rapid HIV testing in urban U.S. hospitals.

Authors:  Laura M Bogart; Devery Howerton; James Lange; Kirsten Becker; Claude Messan Setodji; Steven M Asch
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 8.  The role of safer injection facilities in the response to HIV/AIDS among injection drug users.

Authors:  Thomas Kerr; Jo Kimber; Kora Debeck; Evan Wood
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.071

9.  Aceptabilidad del diagnóstico rápido casero para HIV entre hombres gay y otros hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (G&HSH) de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires.

Authors:  Iván C Balán; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Rubén O Marone; María A Pando; Victoria Barreda; María M Avila
Journal:  Actual SIDA       Date:  2011-03

Review 10.  The essentials of HIV: a review for nurses.

Authors:  Andrew E Petroll; C Bradley Hare; Steven D Pinkerton
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.