Literature DB >> 16124306

Bacterial siderophores promote dissolution of UO2 under reducing conditions.

Scott W Frazier1, Ruben Kretzschmar, Stephan M Kraemer.   

Abstract

Tetravalent actinides are often considered environmentally immobile due to their strong hydrolysis and formation of sparingly soluble oxide phases. However, biogenic ligands commonly found in the soil environment may increase their solubility and mobility. We studied the adsorption and dissolution kinetics of UO2 in the presence of a microbial siderophore, desferrioxamine-B (DFO-B), under reducing conditions. Using batch and continuous flow stirred tank reactors (CFSTR),we found that DFO-B increases the solubility of UIV and accelerates UO2 dissolution rates through a ligand-promoted dissolution mechanism. DFO-B adsorption to UO2 followed a Langmuir-type isotherm. The maximum adsorbed DFO-B concentrations were 3.3 micromol m(-2) between pH 3 and 8 and declined above pH 8. DFO-B dissolved UO2 at a DFO-B surface-saturated net rate of 64 nmol h(-1) m(-2) (pH 7.5, l = 0.01 M) according to the first-order rate equation R = kL[Lads], with a rate coefficient kL of 0.019 h(-1). Even at very low siderophore concentrations (e.g. 1 microM), net dissolution rates (16 nmol h(-1) m(-2), pH 7.5, l = 0.01 M) were substantially greater than net proton-promoted dissolution rates (3 nmol h(-1) m(-2), pH 7-7.5, l = 0.01 M). Interestingly, adding dissolved FeIII had negligible effects on DFO-B-promoted UO2 dissolution rates, despite its potential as a competitor for DFO-B and as an oxidant of UIV. Our results suggest that strong organic ligands could influence the environmental mobility of tetravalent actinides and should be considered in predictions for nuclear waste storage and remediation strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16124306     DOI: 10.1021/es050270n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  5 in total

1.  Microbial links between sulfate reduction and metal retention in uranium- and heavy metal-contaminated soil.

Authors:  Jana Sitte; Denise M Akob; Christian Kaufmann; Kai Finster; Dipanjan Banerjee; Eva-Maria Burkhardt; Joel E Kostka; Andreas C Scheinost; Georg Büchel; Kirsten Küsel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Plutonium(IV) reduction by the metal-reducing bacteria Geobacter metallireducens GS15 and Shewanella oneidensis MR1.

Authors:  Hakim Boukhalfa; Gary A Icopini; Sean D Reilly; Mary P Neu
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Dissolution of biogenic and synthetic UO2 under varied reducing conditions.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Ulrich; Abhas Singh; Eleanor J Schofield; John R Bargar; Harish Veeramani; Jonathan O Sharp; Rizlan Bernier-Latmani; Daniel E Giammar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Bacterial Uranium Resistance.

Authors:  Tom Rogiers; Rob Van Houdt; Adam Williamson; Natalie Leys; Nico Boon; Kristel Mijnendonckx
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Ligand-Induced U Mobilization from Chemogenic Uraninite and Biogenic Noncrystalline U(IV) under Anoxic Conditions.

Authors:  Kyle J Chardi; Anshuman Satpathy; Walter D C Schenkeveld; Naresh Kumar; Vincent Noël; Stephan M Kraemer; Daniel E Giammar
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 11.357

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.