Literature DB >> 16123180

Suboptimal second-trimester ultrasonographic visualization of the fetal heart in obese women: should we repeat the examination?

Israel Hendler1, Sean C Blackwell, Emmanuel Bujold, Marjorie C Treadwell, Pooja Mittal, Robert J Sokol, Yoram Sorokin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a repeated antenatal ultrasound examination improves fetal cardiac visualization for the obese and nonobese population.
METHODS: A computerized ultrasound database (October 1999-June 2003) was used to identify singleton pregnancies undergoing repeated prenatal ultrasound examinations because of initial suboptimal ultrasonographic visualization (SUV) of the 4-chamber view, outflow tracts, or both. Women with maternal diabetes, abnormal maternal serum screening results, or known fetal anomalies at the initial examination were excluded. Patients were classified by maternal body mass index (BMI): less than 30 kg/mg2 (nonobese), 30 to 34.9 kg/mg2 (class I obesity), 35 to 39.9 kg/mg2 (class II obesity), and 40 kg/mg2 or greater (morbid obesity). The association between maternal BMI and SUV of the fetal heart was analyzed.
RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-two patients were abstracted from the database. The median gestational age was 19.0 weeks at the initial visit (range, 18.0-21.9 weeks) and 21.4 weeks at the second visit (range, 18.9-23.9 weeks). The median BMI was 32.6 kg/m2 (range, 16.4-58.7 kg/m2). Sixty-three percent of patients were obese (BMI >or=30). Cardiac anatomy continued to have SUV in 11% of the women. The rate of SUV was associated with the obesity class (1.5% for nonobese, 12% for obesity I, 17% for obesity II, and 20% for morbid obesity; P < .0001). A cardiac anomaly was found in 1 of 372 repeated examinations (arteriovenous canal defect) for a patient with BMI of 24.8 kg/m2.
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated ultrasound examination for SUV of the fetal heart at a later gestational age dramatically reduces SUV. However, obese patients continue to have much higher rates of persistent SUV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16123180     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2005.24.9.1205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  10 in total

1.  Use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of fetal vertebral abnormalities in utero: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Xianyun Cai; Xin Chen; Xinhong Wei; Wen Liu; Ximan Hou; Tao Gong; Jinxia Zhu; Ewart Mark Haacke; Guangbin Wang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-06

2.  Spatiotemporal Coherence to Quantify Sources of Image Degradation in Ultrasonic Imaging.

Authors:  Emelina P Vienneau; Kathryn A Ozgun; Brett C Byram
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Magnetic resonance angiography of fetal vasculature at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Jaladhar Neelavalli; Uday Krishnamurthy; Pavan K Jella; Swati S Mody; Brijesh K Yadav; Kelly Hendershot; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Lami Yeo; Maria D Cabrera; Ewart M Haacke; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Characterization of Thermal and Mechanical Indices from Serial Ultrasound Exams and Associations with Neonatal Anthropometry: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Germaine M Buck Louis; Paul S Albert; Sungduk Kim; Karin M Fuchs; Jagteshwar Grewal; Mary E D'Alton; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  A model and regularization scheme for ultrasonic beamforming clutter reduction.

Authors:  Brett Byram; Kazuyuki Dei; Jaime Tierney; Douglas Dumont
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Feasibility and Accuracy of Early Fetal Echocardiography Performed at 13+0-13+6 Weeks in a Population with Low and High Body Mass Index: a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Raquel García Delgado; Raquel García Rodríguez; Ismael Ortega Cárdenes; Jesús M González Martín; María De Luis Alvarado; Javier Segura González; Margarita Medina Castellano; Jose A García Hernández
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: improving outcomes for mother and child.

Authors:  Irene González; Albert Lecube; Miguel Ángel Rubio; Pedro Pablo García-Luna
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-12-14

8.  Obstetric Outcome in Obese Saudi Pregnant Women: A Cohort Prospective Study at a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Yasmeen A Haseeb
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-20

9.  Feasibility of Fetal Portal Venous System Ultrasound Assessment at the FT Anomaly Scan.

Authors:  Rodica Daniela Nagy; Dan Ruican; George-Lucian Zorilă; Anca-Maria Istrate-Ofiţeru; Anne Marie Badiu; Dominic Gabriel Iliescu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-31

Review 10.  Limitations of Aneuploidy and Anomaly Detection in the Obese Patient.

Authors:  Paula Zozzaro-Smith; Lisa M Gray; Stephen J Bacak; Loralei L Thornburg
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.