BACKGROUND: Making evidence-based decisions in the clinical management of gait dysfunction requires the ability to measure spatiotemporal gait variables validly and reliably. This study examined the accuracy, reliability, and validity of a clinical gait analysis system that is relatively inexpensive and portable, the GaitMat II (GM). METHODS: The trustworthiness of measures taken with the GM was investigated by comparing the placement of the switches on three different GM systems. Measures taken with the GM system were compared with the same measures taken simultaneously with the Vicon motion analysis system, using a repetitive dynamic signal presented to both systems. FINDINGS: Variability was present in the placement of switches on the surfaces of different GM systems. The variability in switch placement was much less than the normal variability of most gait variables measured with the GM. Excellent agreement was found between the GM and Vicon systems for timing variables but poor agreement was found for distance variables. The mean difference between the GM and Vicon measures for distance variables would have little clinical significance in adults for distance measures such as step length or stride length. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of the GaitMat II as a clinical gait analysis tool.
BACKGROUND: Making evidence-based decisions in the clinical management of gait dysfunction requires the ability to measure spatiotemporal gait variables validly and reliably. This study examined the accuracy, reliability, and validity of a clinical gait analysis system that is relatively inexpensive and portable, the GaitMat II (GM). METHODS: The trustworthiness of measures taken with the GM was investigated by comparing the placement of the switches on three different GM systems. Measures taken with the GM system were compared with the same measures taken simultaneously with the Vicon motion analysis system, using a repetitive dynamic signal presented to both systems. FINDINGS: Variability was present in the placement of switches on the surfaces of different GM systems. The variability in switch placement was much less than the normal variability of most gait variables measured with the GM. Excellent agreement was found between the GM and Vicon systems for timing variables but poor agreement was found for distance variables. The mean difference between the GM and Vicon measures for distance variables would have little clinical significance in adults for distance measures such as step length or stride length. CONCLUSION: The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of the GaitMat II as a clinical gait analysis tool.
Authors: Elizabeth S Hile; Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Stephanie A Studenski Journal: Phys Ther Date: 2012-06-28
Authors: Avi Elbaz; Amit Mor; Ganit Segal; Yoav Aloni; Yee Hong Teo; Yee Sze Teo; Shamal Das-De; Seng Jin Yeo Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2014-01-02 Impact factor: 2.359
Authors: Roland Zemp; Renate List; Turgut Gülay; Jean Pierre Elsig; Jaroslav Naxera; William R Taylor; Silvio Lorenzetti Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-18 Impact factor: 3.240