Literature DB >> 16122490

Unnoticed glove perforation during thoracoscopic and open thoracic surgery.

Yuko Kojima1, Masahiko Ohashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgeons tend to underestimate the risk of transferring infection during thoracoscopic operations, although data on glove perforation in thoracoscopic operations have not been reported.
METHODS: Unnoticed perforations of the gloves worn by the same primary surgeon during thoracoscopic procedures and open thoracotomy were studied. Gloves with gross damage and those changed due to assumed damage were excluded. Gloves were tested by filling with water and squeezing to inflate each finger, which could detect a perforation by a 30-gauge needle.
RESULTS: Perforation was found in 25% after thoracoscopic operation, although this was significantly lower than 70% after open thoracotomy. Twelve percent of the gloves worn during thoracoscopic operation were perforated. The perforation rate was higher for gloves worn for more than 2 hours during thoracoscopic operation.
CONCLUSIONS: Glove perforation occurred without being noticed in 25% of thoracoscopic procedures, and in 12% of the gloves used during the procedure. Glove change within 2 hours is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16122490     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Suppression of surgeons' bacterial hand flora during surgical procedures with a new antimicrobial surgical glove.

Authors:  Ojan Assadian; Axel Kramer; Kenneth Ouriel; Miranda Suchomel; Mary-Louise McLaws; Martin Rottman; David Leaper; Afshin Assadian
Journal:  Surg Infect (Larchmt)       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 2.150

2.  Gloves Reprocessing: Does It Really Save Money?

Authors:  Pankaj Arora; Santosh Kumari; Jitender Sodhi; Shweta Talati; Anil Kumar Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Bacterial migration through punctured surgical gloves under real surgical conditions.

Authors:  Nils-Olaf Hübner; Anna-Maria Goerdt; Natalie Stanislawski; Ojan Assadian; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Axel Kramer; Lars Ivo Partecke
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.090

4.  Antibacterial activity of a sterile antimicrobial polyisoprene surgical glove against transient flora following a 2-hours simulated use.

Authors:  Johannes Leitgeb; Rupert Schuster; Bit New Yee; Pui Fong Chee; Julian-Camill Harnoss; Peter Starzengruber; Michael Schäffer; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Perforation of Surgical Gloves during Lower Extremity Fracture Surgery and Hip Joint Replacement Surgery.

Authors:  Sang Wook Lee; Myung-Rae Cho; Ho-Hyoung Lee; Won-Kee Choi; Joo-Hwan Lee
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 6.  Comparison of Unnoticed Glove Perforations during Minimally Invasive versus Open Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sachit Anand; Zenon Pogorelić; Apoorv Singh; Carlos Martin Llorente Muñoz; Nellai Krishnan; Anjan Kumar Dhua; Prabudh Goel; Minu Bajpai
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-01

7.  Effectiveness of surgical hand antisepsis using chlorhexidine digluconate and parachlorometaxylenol hand scrub: Cross-over trial.

Authors:  Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo; David Sevillano Fernandez; Luis Alou Cervera; Laura Martín Aragón; Marta Elena Losa Iglesias; Luis Rodolfo Collado Yurrita; Daniel Lopez Lopez
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Chlorhexidine-coated surgical gloves influence the bacterial flora of hands over a period of 3 hours.

Authors:  Miranda Suchomel; Markus Brillmann; Ojan Assadian; Karen J Ousey; Elisabeth Presterl
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 4.887

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.