Literature DB >> 16122283

Effects of enteral feeding on the oral bioavailability of moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers.

Olaf Burkhardt1, Heino Stass, Uwe Thuss, Klaus Borner, Tobias Welte.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Moxifloxacin is a new generation fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent used worldwide. In clinical practice in intensive care units, moxifloxacin may be frequently administered through a nasogastric feeding tube. In the absence of an oral liquid formulation and since the multivalent cations contained in enteral feeds may potentially impair absorption of moxifloxacin administered via this route, we studied the effect of concomitant enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of moxifloxacin administered as a crushed tablet through the nasogastric tube. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, nonblinded, three-way crossover study. Twelve young healthy volunteers (nine females and three males) aged 20-42 years were included in the study. Each participant received three separate treatment regimens in a randomised fashion: an intact moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet (regimen A, reference treatment), a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and a crushed moxifloxacin 400 mg tablet as a suspension through a nasogastric tube with enteral feeding (regimen C). A washout period of 1-week followed each treatment. Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum were measured by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Additionally, the primary parameters indicative for changes in absorption (area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC(infinity)] and peak serum concentration [C(max)]), were tested for bioequivalence, assuming log-normally distributed data using ANOVA.
RESULTS: All moxifloxacin treatment regimens were well tolerated. The AUC(infinity) was slightly, but not statistically significantly, decreased in treatments with regimens B and C. AUC(infinity) (geometric means 39.6 [regimen A] vs 36.1 [regimen B] vs 36.1 mg.h/L [regimen C] and point estimates 91% for B : A and C : A) indicated bioequivalence of the treatments. Bioequivalence criteria of AUC(infinity) and C(max) were met upon retrospective statistical analysis. Likewise C(max) after moxifloxacin administration through nasogastric tube with water (regimen B) and with tube feed (regimen C) were slightly decreased (geometric means 3.20 [regimen A] vs 3.05 [regimen B] vs 2.83 mg/L [regimen C]; point estimates 88% for B : A, and 95% for C : A). They were within the range seen in other studies conducted with oral administration of the drug. No statistically significant differences were observed in time to reach C(max) (t(max); median 1.75 [regimen A] vs 1.00 [regimen B] vs 1.75 hours [regimen C]). Thus, the rate of absorption of moxifloxacin was not affected by administration through a nasogastric tube. This route of ingestion seems to be associated with a slight loss of bioavailability independent of the carrier medium used (water vs enteral feed); no clinically relevant interaction with the multivalent cations contained in the enteral feed was observed, indicating that moxifloxacin and enteral nutrition can be administered concomitantly.
CONCLUSION: There was no clinically relevant effect of enteral feeding on the pharmacokinetics of oral moxifloxacin in healthy volunteers. This result has to be evaluated in patients, particularly those from the intensive care unit, who are characterised by severe infectious and/or concomitant diseases that might influence absorption of moxifloxacin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16122283     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200544090-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  24 in total

1.  Effects of dairy products on the oral bioavailability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H Stass; D Kubitza
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, after repeated oral administration.

Authors:  H Stass; D Kubitza; U Schühly
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Effects of iron supplements on the oral bioavailability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, in humans.

Authors:  H Stass; D Kubitza
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Effects of sucralfate on the oral bioavailability of moxifloxacin, a novel 8-methoxyfluoroquinolone, in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  H Stass; U Schühly; J G Möller; H Delesen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the newer fluoroquinolone antibacterials.

Authors:  A Aminimanizani; P Beringer; R Jelliffe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone, against species representative of respiratory tract pathogens.

Authors:  M Souli; C B Wennersten; G M Eliopoulos
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of newer fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  G E Stein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  In vitro activity of BAY 12-8039, a new fluoroquinolone.

Authors:  J M Woodcock; J M Andrews; F J Boswell; N P Brenwald; R Wise
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Absolute bioavailability of moxifloxacin.

Authors:  C Ballow; J Lettieri; V Agarwal; P Liu; H Stass; J T Sullivan
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.393

Review 10.  Absorption interactions with fluoroquinolones. 1995 update.

Authors:  B M Lomaestro; G R Bailie
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.606

View more
  5 in total

1.  The bioavailability of bromazepam, omeprazole and paracetamol given by nasogastric feeding tube.

Authors:  Gregory Podilsky; Markoulina Berger-Gryllaki; Bernard Testa; Thierry Buclin; Michel Roulet; Andre Pannatier
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Clinical Equivalency of Ciprofloxacin 750 mg Enterally and 400 mg Intravenously for Patients Receiving Enteral Feeding: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Donna Chui; Lily Cheng; Aaron M Tejani
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-03

3.  Development of an appropriate simple suspension method for valganciclovir medication.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Masaoka; Yoichi Kawasaki; Ryo Kikuoka; Atsushi Ogawa; Satoru Esumi; Yudai Wada; Soichiro Ushio; Yoshihisa Kitamura; Toshiaki Sendo
Journal:  J Pharm Health Care Sci       Date:  2020-07-07

4.  Moxifloxacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.

Authors:  David Rp Guay
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of antimicrobial drugs: a systematic review on oxazolidinones, rifamycines, macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and Beta-lactams.

Authors:  Mathieu S Bolhuis; Prashant N Panday; Arianna D Pranger; Jos G W Kosterink; Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 6.321

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.