Literature DB >> 16121758

Case-mix adjusted odds ratios as an alternative way to compare hospital performances.

Alessandra Capon1, Domenico Di Lallo, Carlo Alberto Perucci, Lea Panepuccia.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two different methods to describe C-section variability among hospital units: case-mix adjusted ORs and case-mix adjusted rates. About 41,755 deliveries without previous C-section occurred in 60 hospitals in 2001 were analysed. Logistic regression was used to produce both adjusted rates and ORs by maternity unit. The two methods showed similar rankings, however ORs estimates were more precise and proved to be a useful tool to describe C-section variability across hospitals.

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16121758     DOI： 10.1007/s10654-005-5250-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN： 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of risk-adjustment methodologies for cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Jennifer Bailit; Joanne Garrett
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.

Authors:  D L DiGiuseppe; D C Aron; S M Payne; R J Snow; L Dierker; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Assessing the role of case mix in cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  E Lieberman; J M Lang; L J Heffner; A Cohen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 7.661
  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Changing analytical approaches in European epidemiology -- a short comment on a recent article.

Authors:  Juan Merlo
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of caesarean delivery rates in low-risk deliveries.

Authors:  Elisa Stivanello; Paola Rucci; Elisa Carretta; Giulia Pieri; Chiara Seghieri; Sabina Nuti; Eugene Declercq; Martina Taglioni; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  P.Re.Val.E.: outcome research program for the evaluation of health care quality in Lazio, Italy.

Authors:  Danilo Fusco; Anna P Barone; Chiara Sorge; Mariangela D'Ovidio; Massimo Stafoggia; Adele Lallo; Marina Davoli; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.

Authors:  Maria P Fantini; Elisa Stivanello; Brunella Frammartino; Anna P Barone; Danilo Fusco; Laura Dallolio; Paolo Cacciari; Carlo A Perucci
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Hospital- and patient-related factors associated with differences in hospital antibiotic use: analysis of national surveillance results.

Authors:  Jon Birger Haug; Dag Berild; Mette Walberg; Åsmund Reikvam
Journal:  Antimicrob Resist Infect Control       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 4.887

6.  The National Outcomes Evaluation Programme in Italy: The Impact of Publication of Health Indicators.

Authors:  Paola Colais; Luigi Pinnarelli; Francesca Mataloni; Barbara Giordani; Giorgia Duranti; Paola D'Errigo; Stefano Rosato; Fulvia Seccareccia; Giovanni Baglio; Marina Davoli
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Determinants of cesarean delivery: a classification tree analysis.

Authors:  Elisa Stivanello; Paola Rucci; Jacopo Lenzi; Maria Pia Fantini
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.