Literature DB >> 16121614

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns of Mycoplasma isolates from various body sites in dairy cattle with Mycoplasma mastitis.

Mary K Biddle1, Larry K Fox, Marc A Evans, Clive C Gay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Mycoplasma strains typically associated with mastitis in dairy cattle can be isolated from body sites other than the mammary gland.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: 7 Holstein cows in various stages of lactation with intramammary Mycoplasma infection. PROCEDURE: Milk samples, antemortem swab specimens from various body sites, and postmortem swab and tissue specimens were submitted for Mycoplasma culture. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed on chromosomal digests of all Mycoplasma isolates. Isolates with the same number and size of chromosomal digest bands were considered to be of the same type.
RESULTS: For each cow, all isolates obtained from milk, mammary gland parenchyma, and supramammary lymph nodes had the same PFGE pattern. All cows had at least 1 isolate from nonmammary system tissues that had the same PFGE pattern as isolates from the mammary system. Overall, 44 of the 70 (63%) Mycoplasma isolates obtained from body sites other than mammary system sites had the same PFGE pattern as did mammary system isolates. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results confirmed our hypothesis that Mycoplasma strains isolated from the milk of dairy cattle with Mycoplasma mastitis frequently have PFGE patterns identical to those for strains isolated from other body sites, suggesting that there is at least a potential for internal transmission of Mycoplasma organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16121614     DOI: 10.2460/javma.2005.227.455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc        ISSN: 0003-1488            Impact factor:   1.936


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of multilocus sequence types found among North American isolates of Mycoplasma bovis from cattle, bison, and deer, 2007-2017.

Authors:  Karen B Register; Murray D Jelinski; Matthew Waldner; William D Boatwright; Tavis K Anderson; David L Hunter; Robert G Hamilton; Pat Burrage; Todd Shury; Robert Bildfell; Peregrine L Wolff; Dale Miskimins; Rachel J Derscheid; Murray R Woodbury
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Clinical Mycoplasma bovis mastitis in prepubertal heifers on 2 dairy herds.

Authors:  Lawrence K Fox; Fredrick J Muller; Michael L Wedam; Christopher S Schneider; Mary Kate Biddle
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Mycoplasma bovis infections in Swiss dairy cattle: a clinical investigation.

Authors:  Marlis Aebi; Bart H P van den Borne; Andreas Raemy; Adrian Steiner; Paola Pilo; Michèle Bodmer
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Comparison of culture and a multiplex probe PCR for identifying Mycoplasma species in bovine milk, semen and swab samples.

Authors:  Alysia M Parker; John K House; Mark S Hazelton; Katrina L Bosward; Paul A Sheehy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A review of mycoplasma diagnostics in cattle.

Authors:  Alysia M Parker; Paul A Sheehy; Mark S Hazelton; Katrina L Bosward; John K House
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Impact of udder infections on biochemical composition of milk in context of pesticides exposure.

Authors:  Hala R Ali; Samah F Ali; Rania H Abd-Algawad; Fayza A Sdeek; Mahmoud Arafa; Essam Kamel; Momtaz A Shahein
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 7.  Mycoplasma bovis Mastitis.

Authors:  Aga E Gelgie; Mesula G Korsa; Oudessa Kerro Dego
Journal:  Curr Res Microb Sci       Date:  2022-02-24

8.  Application of Four Genotyping Methods to Mycoplasma bovis Isolates Derived from Western Canadian Feedlot Cattle.

Authors:  Andrea Kinnear; Matthew Waldner; Tim A McAllister; Rahat Zaheer; Karen Register; Murray Jelinski
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.