OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images for lesion detection in the contrast material-filled bladder. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two observers independently evaluated 47 patients (28 men and 19 women; mean age +/- SD, 59 +/- 16 years) with virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reconstruction, and source CT images acquired with contrast material-filled bladder using an MDCT scanner (detector array, 4 x 1.25 mm; beam pitch, 0.75). Agreement between the two observers was evaluated for the three reconstruction methods using kappa statistics. Using the conventional cystoscopic findings as a reference, we compared the results of the three reconstruction techniques both by bladder site and by patient using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement for the number of positive sites was excellent for virtual cystoscopy (kappa = 0.816), fair for multiplanar reconstruction (kappa = 0.461), and good for source CT images kappa = 0.676). For both observers, the sensitivity for lesion detection by bladder site was significantly greater with virtual cystoscopy (observer 1, 95%; observer 2, 90%) than with multiplanar reconstruction (78% and 60%) and source CT (68% and 65%) images (p < 0.05), whereas the specificity by bladder site and the sensitivity and specificity by patient did not differ with the three methods (p > 0.05). For determining the presence or absence of lesion at each site, virtual cystoscopy was more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for both observers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Virtual cystoscopy is more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for the detection of lesions in the bladder.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reformation, and source CT images for lesion detection in the contrast material-filled bladder. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two observers independently evaluated 47 patients (28 men and 19 women; mean age +/- SD, 59 +/- 16 years) with virtual cystoscopy, multiplanar reconstruction, and source CT images acquired with contrast material-filled bladder using an MDCT scanner (detector array, 4 x 1.25 mm; beam pitch, 0.75). Agreement between the two observers was evaluated for the three reconstruction methods using kappa statistics. Using the conventional cystoscopic findings as a reference, we compared the results of the three reconstruction techniques both by bladder site and by patient using the McNemar test. RESULTS: The interobserver agreement for the number of positive sites was excellent for virtual cystoscopy (kappa = 0.816), fair for multiplanar reconstruction (kappa = 0.461), and good for source CT images kappa = 0.676). For both observers, the sensitivity for lesion detection by bladder site was significantly greater with virtual cystoscopy (observer 1, 95%; observer 2, 90%) than with multiplanar reconstruction (78% and 60%) and source CT (68% and 65%) images (p < 0.05), whereas the specificity by bladder site and the sensitivity and specificity by patient did not differ with the three methods (p > 0.05). For determining the presence or absence of lesion at each site, virtual cystoscopy was more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for both observers (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Virtual cystoscopy is more accurate than multiplanar reconstruction and source CT images for the detection of lesions in the bladder.
Authors: V Panebianco; M Osimani; D Lisi; E Santucci; M Ciccariello; S Iori; C Catalano; R Passariello Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2008-12-11 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Hossam Elawady; Mahmoud A Mahmoud; Diaaeldin M A Mostafa; Alaa Abdelmaksoud; Mohamed W Safa; Remon Z Elia Journal: Arab J Urol Date: 2016-07-25