Literature DB >> 16120809

Evidence for a dispersed Hox gene cluster in the platyhelminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni.

Raymond J Pierce1, Wenjie Wu, Hirohisa Hirai, Al Ivens, Lee D Murphy, Christophe Noël, David A Johnston, François Artiguenave, Martin Adams, Jocelyne Cornette, Eric Viscogliosi, Monique Capron, Guillaume Balavoine.   

Abstract

In most bilaterian organisms so far studied, Hox genes are organized in genomic clusters and determine development along the anteroposterior axis. It has been suggested that this clustering, together with spatial and temporal colinearity of gene expression, represents the ancestral condition. However, in organisms with derived modes of embryogenesis and lineage-dependent mechanisms for the determination of cell fate, temporal colinearity of expression can be lost and Hox cluster organization disrupted, as is the case for the ecdysozoans Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans and the urochordates Ciona intestinalis and Oikopleura dioica. We sought to determine whether a lophotrochozoan, the platyhelminth parasite Schistosoma mansoni, possesses a conserved or disrupted Hox cluster. Using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based strategy, we have cloned and characterized three novel S. mansoni genes encoding orthologues of Drosophila labial (SmHox1), deformed (SmHox4), and abdominal A (SmHox8), as well as the full-length coding sequence of the previously described Smox1, which we identify as an orthologue of fushi tarazu. Quantitative reverse transcriptase-PCR showed that the four genes were expressed at all life-cycle stages but that levels of expression were differentially regulated. Phylogenetic analysis and the conservation of "parapeptide" sequences C-terminal to the homeodomains of SmHox8 and Smox1 support the grouping of platyhelminths within the lophotrochozoan clade. However, Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) library screening followed by genome walking failed to reconstitute a cluster. The BAC clones containing Hox genes were sequenced, and in no case were other Hox genes found on the same clone. Moreover, the SmHox4 and SmHox8 genes contained single very large introns (>40 kbp) further indicating that the schistosome Hox cluster is highly extended. Localization of the Hox genes to chromosomes using fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that SmHox4 and SmHox8 are on the long arm of chromosome 4, whereas SmHox1 and Smox1 are on chromosome 3. In silico screening of the available genome sequences corroborated results of Southern blotting and BAC library screening that indicate that there are no paralogues of SmHox1, SmHox4, or SmHox8. The schistosome Hox cluster is therefore not duplicated, but is both dispersed and disintegrated in the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120809     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msi239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  11 in total

1.  Profiling Schistosoma mansoni development using serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE).

Authors:  David L Williams; Ahmed A Sayed; Jeremiah Bernier; Shanda R Birkeland; Michael J Cipriano; Alexandria R Papa; Andrew G McArthur; Andrew Taft; Jon J Vermeire; Timothy P Yoshino
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 2.011

2.  A PCR survey of Hox genes in the myzostomid Myzostoma cirriferum.

Authors:  Christoph Bleidorn; Deborah Lanterbecq; Igor Eeckhaut; Ralph Tiedemann
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Mouse and zebrafish Hoxa3 orthologues have nonequivalent in vivo protein function.

Authors:  Lizhen Chen; Peng Zhao; Lance Wells; Chris T Amemiya; Brian G Condie; Nancy R Manley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genomic linkage map of the human blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni.

Authors:  Charles D Criscione; Claudia L L Valentim; Hirohisa Hirai; Philip T LoVerde; Timothy J C Anderson
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 5.  Widespread recurrent evolution of genomic features.

Authors:  Ignacio Maeso; Scott William Roy; Manuel Irimia
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 6.  Hox genes are not always Colinear.

Authors:  Ana Sara Monteiro; David E K Ferrier
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 6.580

7.  Pre-bilaterian origins of the Hox cluster and the Hox code: evidence from the sea anemone, Nematostella vectensis.

Authors:  Joseph F Ryan; Maureen E Mazza; Kevin Pang; David Q Matus; Andreas D Baxevanis; Mark Q Martindale; John R Finnerty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rotiferan Hox genes give new insights into the evolution of metazoan bodyplans.

Authors:  Andreas C Fröbius; Peter Funch
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genomic organization and expression demonstrate spatial and temporal Hox gene colinearity in the lophotrochozoan Capitella sp. I.

Authors:  Andreas C Fröbius; David Q Matus; Elaine C Seaver
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  An Overview of Hox Genes in Lophotrochozoa: Evolution and Functionality.

Authors:  Marco Barucca; Adriana Canapa; Maria Assunta Biscotti
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-03-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.