Literature DB >> 16120632

The place for itraconazole in treatment.

Johan Maertens1, Marc Boogaerts.   

Abstract

The incidence of systemic fungal infections has risen sharply in the last two decades, reflecting a rise in the number of patients who are predisposed to these diseases because they are immunosuppressed or immunocompromised. The growing use of intensive chemotherapy to treat cancer, highly immunosuppressive drug regimens (not only in transplant recipients), widespread prophylactic or empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged parenteral nutrition, long-term indwelling lines, improved survival in neonatal and other intensive care units, together with the AIDS epidemic have led to an upsurge in the number of patients at risk. In addition, there have been changes in the epidemiology of systemic fungal infections, with Aspergillus spp. and Candida spp. other than Candida albicans becoming increasingly common causes. These changes have affected the selection of drugs for first-line or prophylactic use, as not all agents have the critical spectrum of activity required. The management of systemic fungal infections can be divided into four main strategies: prophylaxis, early empirical use, pre-emptive and definite therapy. Antifungal prophylaxis is given based on the patient risk factors, but in the absence of infection. Empirical antifungal therapy is given in patients at risk with signs of infection of unclear aetiology (usually persistent fever) but of possible fungal origin. Therapy is given pre-emptively in patients at risk with additional evidence for the presence of an infective agent in a way predisposing for infection (e.g. Aspergillus colonization; high Candida colonization index). Finally, definite treatment is used in patients with confirmed fungal infection. The distinction between risk-adapted prophylaxis, early empirical therapy, and pre-emptive use of antifungals often becomes unclear and clinical decision making depends largely on local epidemiology and resistance patterns, adequate definition of patient risk categories, early diagnosis and the calculation of cost-benefit ratios. This article addresses the use of itraconazole in the treatment of invasive fungal infections in the haematology patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120632     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  9 in total

1.  Itraconazole prophylaxis in pediatric cancer patients receiving conventional chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Arne Simon; Mette Besuden; Sandra Vezmar; Carola Hasan; Dagmar Lampe; Sigrid Kreutzberg; Axel Glasmacher; Udo Bode; Gudrun Fleischhack
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Medical cost analysis for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a systematic simulation analysis.

Authors:  Osamu Imataki; Yoshitsugu Kubota; Hiroaki Ohnishi; Akira Kitanaka; Toshihiko Ishida; Terukazu Tanaka
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  In vitro activities of new triazole antifungal agents, posaconazole and voriconazole, against oral Candida isolates from patients suffering from denture stomatitis.

Authors:  Cristina Marcos-Arias; Elena Eraso; Lucila Madariaga; Alfonso Javier Carrillo-Muñoz; Guillermo Quindós
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2011-08-14       Impact factor: 2.574

4.  Voriconazole treatment of invasive aspergillosis: real-world versus health-economic model results.

Authors:  Hilde Van Campenhout; Sophie Marbaix; Marie-Paule Derde; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 5.  Current approaches in antifungal prophylaxis in high risk hematologic malignancy and hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients.

Authors:  Baldeep Wirk; John R Wingard
Journal:  Mycopathologia       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.574

6.  Intravenous itraconazole vs. amphotericin B deoxycholate for empirical antifungal therapy in patients with persistent neutropenic fever.

Authors:  Sun Hee Park; Su-Mi Choi; Dong-Gun Lee; Jung-Hyun Choi; Jin-Hong Yoo; Woo-Sung Min; Wan-Shik Shin
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.884

7.  The influence of ionizing radiation on itraconazole in the solid state.

Authors:  Katarzyna Dettlaff; Przemysław Talik; Grzegorz Spólnik; Witold Danikiewicz; Magdalena Ogrodowczyk
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.246

8.  Formulation and delivery of itraconazole to the brain using a nanolipid carrier system.

Authors:  Wei Meng Lim; Paruvathanahalli Siddalingam Rajinikanth; Chitneni Mallikarjun; Yew Beng Kang
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2014-05-02

9.  Hospital and community acquired infection and the built environment--design and testing of infection control rooms.

Authors:  J T Walker; P Hoffman; A M Bennett; M C Vos; M Thomas; N Tomlinson
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.926

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.