Literature DB >> 16120406

Gene expression profiling in mitochondrial disease: assessment of microarray accuracy by high-throughput Q-PCR.

Kenneth B Beckman1, Kathleen Y Lee, Tamara Golden, Simon Melov.   

Abstract

Mitochondrial diseases are a heterogeneous array of disorders with a complex etiology. Use of microarrays as a tool to investigate complex human disease is increasingly common, however, a principle drawback of microarrays is their limited dynamic range, due to the poor quantification of weak signals. Although it is generally understood that low-intensity microarray 'spots' may be unreliable, there exists little documentation of their accuracy. Quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) is frequently used to validate microarray data, yet few Q-PCR validation studies have focused on the accuracy of low-intensity microarray signals. Hence, we have used Q-PCR to systematically assess microarray accuracy as a function of signal strength in a mouse model of mitochondrial disease, the superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2) nullizygous mouse. We have focused on a unique category of data--spots with only one weak signal in a two-dye comparative hybridization--and show that such 'high-low' signal intensities are common for differentially expressed genes. This category of differential expression may be more important in mitochondrial disease in which there are often mosaic expression patterns due to the idiosyncratic distribution of mutant mtDNA in heteroplasmic individuals. Using RNA from the SOD2 mouse, we found that when spotted cDNA microarray data are filtered for quality (low variance between many technical replicates) and spot intensity (above a negative control threshold in both channels), there is an excellent quantitative concordance with Q-PCR (R2 = 0.94). The accuracy of gene expression ratios from low-intensity spots (R2 = 0.27) and 'high-low' spots (R2 = 0.32) is considerably lower. Our results should serve as guidelines for microarray interpretation and the selection of genes for validation in mitochondrial disorders.

Entities:  

Year:  2004        PMID: 16120406     DOI: 10.1016/j.mito.2004.07.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mitochondrion        ISSN: 1567-7249            Impact factor:   4.160


  12 in total

1.  Intrahepatic expression of genes related to metabotropic receptors in chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  Andrzej Cieśla; Maciej Kuśmider; Agata Faron-Górecka; Marta Dziedzicka-Wasylewska; Monika Bociąga-Jasik; Danuta Owczarek; Irena Ciećko-Michalska; Dorota Cibor; Tomasz Mach
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Responses of muscle mass, strength and gene transcripts to long-term heat stress in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Katsumasa Goto; Hideshi Oda; Hidehiko Kondo; Michihito Igaki; Atsushi Suzuki; Shuichi Tsuchiya; Takatoshi Murase; Tadashi Hase; Hiroto Fujiya; Ichiro Matsumoto; Hisashi Naito; Takao Sugiura; Yoshinobu Ohira; Toshitada Yoshioka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-28       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The transcriptional regulator, CosR, controls compatible solute biosynthesis and transport, motility and biofilm formation in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Nicholas J Shikuma; Kimberly R Davis; Jiunn N C Fong; Fitnat H Yildiz
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Genome-wide transcriptional analyses of islet-specific CD4+ T cells identify Idd9 genes controlling diabetogenic T cell function.

Authors:  Gregory J Berry; Christine Frielle; Thaiphi Luu; Anna C Salzberg; Daniel B Rainbow; Linda S Wicker; Hanspeter Waldner
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  Identification and comparative analyses of myocardial miRNAs involved in the fetal response to maternal obesity.

Authors:  Alina Maloyan; Sribalasubashini Muralimanoharan; Steven Huffman; Laura A Cox; Peter W Nathanielsz; Leslie Myatt; Mark J Nijland
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.107

6.  Microarray analysis of juvenile hormone response in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells.

Authors:  David K Willis; Jun Wang; Joliene R Lindholm; Anthony Orth; Walter G Goodman
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

7.  Microarray validation: factors influencing correlation between oligonucleotide microarrays and real-time PCR.

Authors:  Jeanine S Morey; James C Ryan; Frances M Van Dolah
Journal:  Biol Proced Online       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.244

8.  A dual-tag microarray platform for high-performance nucleic acid and protein analyses.

Authors:  Olle Ericsson; Jonas Jarvius; Edith Schallmeiner; Mathias Howell; Rachel Yuan Nong; Hendrik Reuter; Meinhard Hahn; Johan Stenberg; Mats Nilsson; Ulf Landegren
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-03-16       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA microarray profiling of genes differentially regulated by the histone deacetylase inhibitors vorinostat and LBH589 in colon cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Melissa J LaBonte; Peter M Wilson; William Fazzone; Susan Groshen; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Robert D Ladner
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Validating nutrient-related gene expression changes from microarrays using RT(2) PCR-arrays.

Authors:  S Gaj; L Eijssen; R P Mensink; C T A Evelo
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 5.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.