Literature DB >> 16120036

Assessment of dose selection attributes with audible notification in insulin pen devices.

Toshinari Asakura1, Hiroaki Seino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with type 2 diabetes often suffer from impairments in vision as well as manual dexterity. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of dose selection and setting of five insulin devices by patients using auditory and sensory confirmation.
METHODS: A total of 48 patients (30 men, 18 women; mean +/- SD age 60.5 +/- 14.0 years; hemoglobin A(1c) 8.7 +/- 1.9%) were randomized to test the following devices: NovoPen 3 (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark), HumaPen Ergo (Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN), Humalog Pen (Eli Lilly), InnoLet (Novo Nordisk), and FlexPen(Novo Nordisk).
RESULTS: Significantly more patients detected an auditory confirmation of dose setting when using the NovoPen 3 compared with the Humalog Pen (P < 0.001), HumaPen Ergo (P < 0.001), and InnoLet (P < 0.01). The audible click for the FlexPen was also heard by more patients than for the Humalog Pen (P < 0.001) and HumaPen Ergo (P < 0.01). All patients found that the Flex- Pen provided physical sensory confirmation; the percentage was higher than for those using the Humalog Pen (P < 0.001), HumaPen Ergo (P < 0.001), and InnoLet (P < 0.01). The NovoPen 3 was also associated with a higher percentage of patients who felt the click sensation than with the Humalog Pen (P < 0.001) and HumaPen Ergo (P < 0.01). Patients reported more confidence in setting the correct dose with the NovoPen 3 and FlexPen, and found these the most reliable for dose setting. Sound recordings showed that the NovoPen 3 produced the loudest clicks when setting a dose (P < 0.001 for all comparisons).
CONCLUSIONS: The clarity of the click when setting a dose on an insulin delivery device can affect the patient's confidence in selecting the correct dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120036     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  7 in total

1.  A comparison of dosing accuracy: visually impaired and sighted people using insulin pens.

Authors:  Ann S Williams; Patrick A Schnarrenberger
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

Review 2.  Practical aspects of insulin pen devices.

Authors:  Teresa L Pearson
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

3.  Analysis of comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skills.

Authors:  Kellie J Antinori-Lent
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

Review 4.  A review of 25 years' experience with the NovoPen family of insulin pens in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jacob Hyllested-Winge; Klaus H Jensen; Jørn Rex
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.580

Review 5.  A review of reusable insulin pens and features of TouStar-a new reusable pen with a dedicated cartridge.

Authors:  Robert Veasey; Carolin A Ruf; Dmitri Bogatirsky; Jukka Westerbacka; Arnd Friedrichs; Mona Abdel-Tawab; Steffen Adler; Senthilnathan Mohanasundaram
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.320

6.  Examining correlates of treatment satisfaction for injectable insulin in type 2 diabetes: lessons learned from a clinical trial comparing biphasic and basal analogues.

Authors:  Meryl Brod; David Cobden; Morten Lammert; Donald Bushnell; Philip Raskin
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 3.186

7.  Initial experience and evaluation of reusable insulin pen devices among patients with diabetes in emerging countries.

Authors:  Balduino Tschiedel; Oscar Almeida; Jennifer Redfearn; Frank Flacke
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.945

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.