Literature DB >> 16119534

5-Fluorouracil-induced vasospastic angina.

Orhan Ayyildiz, Aziz Karabulut, Abdurrahman Isikdogan, Omer Cakir, Mehmet Dursun.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119534      PMCID: PMC6147987          DOI: 10.5144/0256-4947.2005.263b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.526


× No keyword cloud information.
To the Editor: The antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is frequently administered as chemotherapy for various malignancies, can rarely cause stable angina, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, and sudden death.1 The underlying mechanisms of cardiotoxicity are not yet fully known, although coronary vasospasm may be responsible.2,3 Chest angina has been noted both on the initial and the second and third course. Mortality may increase when courses are repeated. We describe a patient who developed chest angina, likely of vasospastic origin, during treatment with 5-FU. A 31-year-old male had metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed in May 2003. He had no history of cardiac disease. On June 2, a peripheral venous catheter was implanted and an intravenous infusion of 5-FU (425 mg/m2 IV bolus daily on days 1 to 5) was started. He received 2 cycles of chemotherapy (5-FU plus leucovorin), with a cumulative 5-FU dose of 2890 mg. At the end of June 2003, on the third day of the second cycle, the patient suffered from typical chest pains and was referred to our clinic for a cardiologic evaluation. He had a similar history of symptoms on the first course of 5-FU. Physical examination and two-dimensional echocardiography were normal. The electrocardiogram (ECG) at rest showed ST segment elevation in leads DII, DIII, aVF, V5, and V6. Symptoms resolved after nitroglycerin infusion during the tenth minute, the ST elevation returned to baseline and negative T waves occurred (Figure 1). Negative T waves return to normal after three days (Figure 2). Cardiac enzymes were normal. Hemoglobin was 13 g/dL. Serum electrolytes and renal function were normal. The negativity of the test and absence of chest pain after 5-FU interruption indicates the absence of chronic, flow-limiting coronary stenosis. For complete confirmation, coronary angiography was done on the second day of angina and found as normal. Intracoronary nitroglycerin was not used during angiography. Three days later, the patient was completely asymptomatic and his ECG at rest was normal. The patient remained asymptomatic and the ECG was normal in clinical follow up.
Figure 1

ST elevation returned to baseline and negative T waves occurred after nitroglycerin infusion.

Figure 2

Normal electrocardiogram after three days.

Cardiotoxicity has been reported as a side effect of anticancer drugs, particularly in patients undergoing anthracycline antibiotics. The cardiotoxicity of 5-FU also has been known for years, but the drug is not familiar to many physicians. There are a few case reports of angina pectoris and even myocardial infarction associated with 5-FU.4,5 The mechanism of cardiotoxicity is uncertain and speculative. In vitro studies have shown an endothelium-independent vasoconstriction of vascular smooth muscle cells, involving activation of protein kinase C. Exercise is a known potential vasoconstrictor trigger, possibly through noradrenergic sympathetic stimulation. Symptoms were associated with the initiation of 5-FU treatment, which has a recognized potential to cause spasm, and disappeared after its cessation. The angina is occasionally delayed to 3 to 18 hours after 5-FU injection. Porta et al. found high plasma levels of endothelin-1 (ET-1), a potent natural vasoconstrictor, in two patients who experienced two of the commonest clinical manifestations of 5-FU-induced cardiac toxicity, i.e., angina pectoris and chronic heart failure.6 They, therefore, proposed ET-1 as the ultimate mediator of this toxicity, even though the mechanism of ET-1 increase in peripheral venous blood is still unknown. Finally, another important question still remains unresolved: is the release of ET-1 from normal coronary endothelial cells the prime cause or simply the consequence of 5-FU-related cardiotoxicity? Spasm can be triggered by an array of stimuli acting on different receptors, such as ergonovine, histamine, serotonin, and acetylcholine, as well as by severe alkalosis by handgrip and cold pressor tests. Thus, localized postreceptor alterations that make the coronary artery smooth muscle hyperactive to a variety of constrictor stimuli appear the likely pathogenetic mechanisms for the typical clinical syndromes of variant angina.7 In addition, chest pain associated with 5-FU has several characteristics that are incompatible with coronary artery spasm, e.g., inadequate efficacy of a calcium-channel blocker and a slow increase in cardiac enzyme levels. Mizuno et al. experienced a case of 5-FU-induced cardiotoxicity, which showed clinical findings consistent with acute myocardial infarction. Based on the clinical findings, coronary angiography, and left ventricular angiography in a prolonged attack, they concluded that the cardiotoxicity in this case was not due to ischemia caused by coronary artery spasm.8 Keefe et al. reported that of 910 patients who treated with 5-FU, 5 developed life-threatening toxicity consistent with coronary artery spasm for an incidence of 0.5%.9 Some reports suggest that more invasive tests were not clinically indicated. 1 Although angiographic confirmation of vasospasm was not obtained, ST-segment elevation during the early recovery phase of an exercise stress test is considered a hallmark of transmural ischemia of vasospastic origin.2 A history of cardiac arrhythmias or of syncope occurring during angina, or immediately after, is particularly suggestive of vasospastic angina and is a strong indication for cessation of 5-FU and for prescribing full antivasospastic therapy. A high index of suspicion for cardiotoxicity must be maintained when the drug is administered, especially in the presence of heart disease and concomitant radiation therapy.10 Concomitant chemotherapeutic agents, received by all the affected patients, may have a contributory effect. Cardiotoxicity seems to be completely reversible, particularly in patients without underlying cardiac disease. The patients should be informed about the symptoms and the condition recognized and managed immediately. 11 As beta-blockers are totally ineffective, antivasospastic therapy should be based on a full dose of calcium antagonists and also of nitrates, administered to cover the time when attacks recur, to avoid the development of tolerance. Myocardial infarction and pericarditis should be clarified in the differential diagnosis of ST elevation. This report of vasospastic angina by 5-FU emphasizes the importance of cardiac events during 5-FU. In addition, chest pain should alert the physician during treatment with this agent.
  11 in total

1.  Coronary vasospasm as a cause of effort-related myocardial ischemia during low-dose chronic continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  C Lestuzzi; E Viel; E Picano; N Meneguzzo
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Fluorouracil-induced coronary artery spasm.

Authors:  A Maseri; G Lanza
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  5-flurouracil induced coronary artery vasospasm.

Authors:  V Suresh; A Khavandi; H Hancock
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  5-Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: a critical review.

Authors:  W J Gradishar; E E Vokes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Coronary artery spasm and vasoconstriction. The case for a distinction.

Authors:  A Maseri; G Davies; D Hackett; J C Kaski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  A case of 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity simulating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Y Mizuno; Y Hokamura; T Kimura; Y Kimura; K Kaikita; H Yasue
Journal:  Jpn Circ J       Date:  1995-05

Review 7.  [Cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil: coronary spasm? Apropos of 2 cases with normal coronarography].

Authors:  P Cristofini; M Desnos; O Guenot; F Funck; A Hagege; J Trotoux; C Guerot
Journal:  Ann Med Interne (Paris)       Date:  1989

8.  Clinical cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  D L Keefe; N Roistacher; M K Pierri
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 9.  Fluorouracil cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  A J Anand
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Endothelin-1 and 5-fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity.

Authors:  C Porta; M Moroni; S Ferrari; G Nastasi
Journal:  Neoplasma       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.575

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.