Literature DB >> 16119395

Differences between searching among objects and searching among holes.

Johan Hulleman1, Glyn W Humphreys.   

Abstract

We report results from six experiments in which participants had to search for a "C" among "O" distractors. The search items were either holes or objects, defined by motion, contrast, or both. Our main findings were (1) it was easier to search among objects than to search among holes, and (2) the difference between search among objects and search among holes was primarily caused by grouping with the background. The data support the hypothesis that the shape of a hole is only available indirectly. We further note that, in our experiments, search performance for both holes and objects depended on the surface medium used to define the search items.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119395     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  3 in total

1.  The shape of a hole and that of the surface-with-hole cannot be analyzed separately.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Mai Salah Helmy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Can we track holes?

Authors:  Todd S Horowitz; Yoana Kuzmova
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Attentional selection and the representation of holes and objects.

Authors:  Alice R Albrecht; Alexandra List; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.