Literature DB >> 16119327

Comparing F0 discrimination in sequential and simultaneous conditions.

Christophe Micheyl1, Andrew J Oxenham.   

Abstract

In an influential study, Carlyon and Shackleton [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95, 3541-3554 (1994)] measured listeners' performance (d') in fundamental-frequency (F0) discrimination between harmonic complex tones (HCTs) presented simultaneously in different spectral regions and compared their performance with that found in a sequential-comparison task. In this Letter, it is suggested that Carlyon and Shackleton's analysis of the simultaneous-comparison data did not adequately reflect their assumption that listeners were effectively comparing F0's across regions. A reanalysis consistent with this assumption is described. The new results suggest that under the assumption that listeners were effectively comparing F0 across regions, their performance in this task was substantially higher than originally estimated by Carlyon and Shackleton, and in some conditions much higher than expected from the performances measured in a traditional F0-discrimination task with sequential HCTs. Possible explanations for this outcome, as well as alternative interpretations, are proposed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119327      PMCID: PMC1357019          DOI: 10.1121/1.1929228

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  A Thurstonian model for the dual pair (4IAX) discrimination method.

Authors:  B Rousseau; D M Ennis
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-08

2.  Evidence for two pitch encoding mechanisms using a selective auditory training paradigm.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Christophe Micheyl; Robert P Carlyon; Lionel Collet
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

3.  Spectral pattern, harmonic relations, and the perceptual grouping of low-numbered components.

Authors:  Brian Roberts; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Across-frequency interference effects in fundamental frequency discrimination: questioning evidence for two pitch mechanisms.

Authors:  Hedwig Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Sequential F0 comparisons between resolved and unresolved harmonics: no evidence for translation noise between two pitch mechanisms.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Likelihood ratio, optimal decision rules, and correct response probabilities in a signal detection theoretic, equal-variance Gaussian model of the observer in the 4IAX paradigm.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; David P Messing
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2006-07

7.  Towards a model for discrimination of broadband signals.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida; Y Ito
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Intensity perception. I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution.

Authors:  N I Durlach; L D Braida
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Pitch discrimination of harmonic complex signals: residue pitch or multiple component discriminations?

Authors:  A Faulkner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Psychophysical pitch biases related to vowel quality, intensity difference, and sequential order.

Authors:  C K Chuang; W S Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping affects pitch judgments across time and frequency.

Authors:  Elizabeth M O Borchert; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  An evaluation of psychophysical models of auditory change perception.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Christian Kaernbach; Laurent Demany
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Pitch, harmonicity and concurrent sound segregation: psychoacoustical and neurophysiological findings.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.