Literature DB >> 16118910

Endoscopic ablation of dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus comparing argon plasma coagulation and photodynamic therapy: a randomized prospective trial assessing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.

Krish Ragunath1, Neville Krasner, V Sankara Raman, Mustafa T Haqqani, Ceri J Phillips, Ivy Cheung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic mucosal ablation is a promising technique that is used to treat dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of two promising techniques, argon plasma coagulation (APC) and photodynamic therapy (PDT), in the ablation of dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus (21 M, median age 60 years, median length 4 cm, 23 low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 3 high-grade dysplasia (HGD)) were randomized to APC: 13 patients, PDT: 13 patients. APC was performed at a power setting of 65 W and argon gas flow at 1.8 l/min in 1-6 sessions (mean 5). PDT was performed 48 h after intravenous injection of Photofrin 2 mg/kg with a 630 nm red laser light, 200 J/cm through a PDT balloon in one session. All patients received treatment with high-dose proton pump inhibitors. Cost analysis was undertaken and the results were assessed by endoscopy and biopsies at 4 months and 12 months after therapy.
RESULTS: All patients in both groups showed a reduction in the length of Barrett's oesophagus. The median length of Barrett's oesophagus eradicated at the 4-month follow-up: APC 65%, PDT 57% and at the 12-month follow-up: APC 56%, PDT 60%. Dysplasia eradication at 4 months: APC 62%, PDT 77%, p = 0.03 (95% CI 0.66-0.96) and at 12 months APC 67%, PDT 77%. Buried columnar glands with intestinal metaplasia were seen in both groups, with one patient in the PDT arm developing adenocarcioma under the neo-squamous epithelium. Severe adverse events included APC 2/13 (15%) stricture, 1/13 (8%) odynophagia, chest pain and fever; PDT 2/13 (15%) photosensitivity, 2/13 (15%) stricture. PDT would cost an additional 266 pounds sterling for every percentage reduction in Barrett's length and 146 pounds sterling per percentage reduction in dysplasia compared with APC treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: APC and PDT are equally effective in eradicating Barrett's mucosa, with PDT being the more expensive treatment. However, PDT is more effective in eradicating dysplasia and the extra benefits of PDT are generated at an extra cost. The occurrence of buried columnar glands and carcinoma warrants caution. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess cancer prevention and the durability of the neo-squamous epithelium to justify these interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118910     DOI: 10.1080/00365520510015737

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0036-5521            Impact factor:   2.423


  29 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic management of Barrett's esophagus: advances in endoscopic techniques.

Authors:  Ali Azarm; Ismet Lukolic; Meenal Shukla; Ronald Concha-Parra; Frank Gress
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Barrett's esophagus: endoscopic treatments II.

Authors:  Bruce D Greenwald; Charles J Lightdale; Julian A Abrams; John D Horwhat; Ram Chuttani; Srinadh Komanduri; Melissa P Upton; Henry D Appelman; Helen M Shields; Nicholas J Shaheen; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 3.  Endoscopic options for early stage esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Pari M Shah; Hans Gerdes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 4.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of the treatment for Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  You-Ming Li; Lan Li; Chao-Hui Yu; You-Shi Liu; Cheng-Fu Xu
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Comparison of COX-2, Ki-67, and BCL-2 expression in normal esophageal mucosa, Barrett's esophagus, dysplasia, and adenocarcinoma with postablation mucosa and implications for ablative therapies.

Authors:  Christopher John Lewis; Sri Ganeshamurthy Thrumurthy; Susan Pritchard; Gordon Armstrong; Stephen Edwin Arthur Attwood
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Buried metaplasia after endoscopic ablation of Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathan A Gray; Robert D Odze; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the management of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler; Prateek Sharma; Rhonda F Souza; John M Inadomi; Nicholas J Shaheen
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  History, molecular mechanisms, and endoscopic treatment of Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  Stuart Jon Spechler; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Ganapathy A Prasad; Kenneth K Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  Photodynamic Therapy for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Bashar J Qumseya; Waseem David; Herbert C Wolfsen
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2013-01-31

10.  Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of endoscopic low-pressure liquid nitrogen spray cryotherapy in the esophagus.

Authors:  Bruce D Greenwald; John A Dumot; J David Horwhat; Charles J Lightdale; Julian A Abrams
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 3.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.