Literature DB >> 16118805

Quality of life among patients with Stage II and III breast carcinoma randomized to receive high-dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support or intermediate-dose chemotherapy: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 9066.

Jeffrey Peppercorn1, James Herndon, Alice B Kornblith, William Peters, Tim Ahles, James Vredenburgh, Gary Schwartz, Elizabeth Shpall, David D Hurd, Jimmie Holland, Eric Winer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the quality of life (QOL) after treatment among patients who had breast carcinoma with multiple positive lymph nodes. The patients were randomized to receive either high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support (HDC) or intermediate-dose chemotherapy (IDC) in the adjuvant setting.
METHODS: Two hundred forty-six patients with AJCC Stage IIA, IIB, or IIIA breast carcinoma who had > or = 10 positive lymph nodes and who were participants in Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 9082 were enrolled in this companion study, CALGB 9066. Patients were randomized to receive either high-dose cyclophosphamide, carmustine, and cisplatin (CPA/cDDP/BCNU) and autologous bone marrow transplantation (the HDC arm) or intermediate-dose CPA/cDDP/BCNU as consolidation to adjuvant chemotherapy (the IDC arm). QOL was assessed at baseline and at 3 months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months using the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC), the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS)-Self Report, and the McCorkle Symptom Distress Scale (SDS).
RESULTS: At the 3-month assessment, patients in the HDC arm demonstrated significant worsening of QOL compared with the IDC arm in terms of their physical well being (FLIC, P = 0.023), social functioning (FLIC, P = 0.026; PAIS, P < 0.0001), symptom distress (SDS, P = 0.0002), and total QOL scores (FLIC, P = 0.042). At 12 months, the differences in QOL scores between the HDC arm and the IDC arm had resolved.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received more intensive adjuvant therapy experienced transient declines in QOL. By 12 months after therapy, QOL was comparable between the 2 arms, regardless of therapy intensity, and many QOL areas were improved from baseline. Copyright 2005 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118805     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21363

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Effect of socioeconomic status as measured by education level on survival in breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  James E Herndon; Alice B Kornblith; Jimmie C Holland; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Health-related quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: differences by adjuvant chemotherapy dose in Cancer and Leukemia Group B study 8541.

Authors:  Electra Paskett; James Herndon; Kathleen Donohue; Michelle Naughton; Stephen Grubbs; Michael Pavy; Martee Hensley; Nancy Stark; Alice Kornblith; Marisa Bittoni
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 3.  High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.

Authors:  Cindy Farquhar; Jane Marjoribanks; Anne Lethaby; Maimoona Azhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-20

4.  Health related quality of life in different states of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mathias Lidgren; Nils Wilking; Bengt Jönsson; Clas Rehnberg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Changes in quality of life and its related factors in liver cancer patients receiving stereotactic radiation therapy.

Authors:  Shiow-Ching Shun; Jeng-Fong Chiou; Yeur-Hur Lai; Po-Jui Yu; Lin-Lin Wei; Jo-Ting Tsai; Chung-Yu Kao; Ya-Li Hsiao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 6.  Ethical issues in autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in advanced breast cancer: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sigrid Droste; Annegret Herrmann-Frank; Fueloep Scheibler; Tanja Krones
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-29

8.  Ethical guideposts to clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  M Bernstein
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Quality of life and quality-adjusted survival (Q-TWiST) in patients receiving dose-intensive or standard dose chemotherapy for high-risk primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J Bernhard; D Zahrieh; J J Zhang; G Martinelli; R Basser; C Hürny; J F Forbes; S Aebi; W Yeo; B Thürlimann; M D Green; M Colleoni; R D Gelber; M Castiglione-Gertsch; K N Price; A Goldhirsch; A S Coates
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.