Literature DB >> 16118789

Three-dimensional fiber-deposited PEOT/PBT copolymer scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of porosity, molecular network mesh size, and swelling in aqueous media on dynamic mechanical properties.

L Moroni1, J R de Wijn, C A van Blitterswijk.   

Abstract

Among novel scaffold fabrication techniques, 3D fiber deposition (3DF) has recently emerged as a means to fabricate well-defined and custom-made scaffolds for tissue regeneration, with 100% interconnected pores. The mechanical behavior of these constructs is dependent not only on different three-dimensional architectural and geometric features, but also on the intrinsic chemical properties of the material used. These affect the mechanics of the solid material and eventually of 3D porous constructs derived from them. For instance, poly(ethylene oxide terephthalate)-poly(butylene terephthalate) (PEOT/PBT) block copolymers are known to have mechanical properties, depending on the PEOT/PBT weight ratio in block form and on the molecular weight of the initial poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) blocks. These differences are enhanced even more by their different swelling properties in aqueous media. Therefore, this article examines the influence of copolymer compositions in terms of their swelling on dynamic mechanical properties of solid material and porous 3DF scaffolds. The molecular weight of the starting PEG blocks used in the copolymer synthesis varied from 300 to 1000 g/mol. The PEOT/PBT weight ratio in the blocks used varied from 55/45 to 80/20. This corresponded to an increase of the swelling ratio Q from 1.06 to 2.46, and of the mesh size xi from approximately 9 Angstrom to approximately 47 Angstrom. With increased swelling, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) revealed a decrease in elastic response and an increase of viscoelasticity. Thus, by coupling structural and chemical characteristics, the viscoelastic properties of PEOT/PBT 3DF scaffolds may be fine tuned to achieve mechanical requirements for a variety of engineered tissues. Ultimately, the combination of 3DF and DMA may be useful to validate the hypothesis that mimicking the biomechanical behavior of a specific tissue for its optimal replacement is an important issue for at least some tissue-engineering applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118789     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A        ISSN: 1549-3296            Impact factor:   4.396


  17 in total

1.  Rapid prototyping amphiphilic polymer/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with hydration-induced self-fixation behavior.

Authors:  Artem B Kutikov; Anvesh Gurijala; Jie Song
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  Bioresorbable scaffold as a dermal substitute.

Authors:  Lenon Cardoso; Marília Colturato Cleto; Maria Lourdes Peris Barbo; Andréa Rodrigues Esposito; Flavio Stillitano Orgaes; Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Duek
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2017-07-25

3.  Polymers for 3D Printing and Customized Additive Manufacturing.

Authors:  Samuel Clark Ligon; Robert Liska; Jürgen Stampfl; Matthias Gurr; Rolf Mülhaupt
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-07-30       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  3D fiber deposited polymeric scaffolds for external auditory canal wall.

Authors:  Carlos Mota; Mario Milazzo; Daniele Panetta; Luisa Trombi; Vera Gramigna; Piero A Salvadori; Stefano Giannotti; Luca Bruschini; Cesare Stefanini; Lorenzo Moroni; Stefano Berrettini; Serena Danti
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  3D Culture Modeling of Metastatic Breast Cancer Cells in Additive Manufactured Scaffolds.

Authors:  Afroditi Nanou; Ivan Lorenzo-Moldero; Kyriakos D Gazouleas; Barbara Cortese; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 10.383

6.  Finite Element Analysis of Meniscal Anatomical 3D Scaffolds: Implications for Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  L Moroni; F M Lambers; W Wilson; C C van Donkelaar; J R de Wijn; R Huiskesb; C A van Blitterswijk
Journal:  Open Biomed Eng J       Date:  2007-08-07

7.  Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and Its Potential in the Field of Articular Cartilage Regeneration.

Authors:  Vivian H M Mouser; Riccardo Levato; Lawrence J Bonassar; Darryl D D'Lima; Daniel A Grande; Travis J Klein; Daniel B F Saris; Marcy Zenobi-Wong; Debby Gawlitta; Jos Malda
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Regenerating articular tissue by converging technologies.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moroni; Doreen Hamann; Luca Paoluzzi; Jeroen Pieper; Joost R de Wijn; Clemens A van Blitterswijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Distribution and Viability of Fetal and Adult Human Bone Marrow Stromal Cells in a Biaxial Rotating Vessel Bioreactor after Seeding on Polymeric 3D Additive Manufactured Scaffolds.

Authors:  Anne M Leferink; Yhee-Cheng Chng; Clemens A van Blitterswijk; Lorenzo Moroni
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2015-10-23

10.  Combining technologies to create bioactive hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Anandkumar Nandakumar; Ana Barradas; Jan de Boer; Lorenzo Moroni; Clemens van Blitterswijk; Pamela Habibovic
Journal:  Biomatter       Date:  2013-01-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.