Literature DB >> 16118644

Molecular cytogenetic analyses of breakpoints in apparently balanced reciprocal translocations carried by phenotypically normal individuals.

Julia Baptista1, Elena Prigmore, Susan M Gribble, Patricia A Jacobs, Nigel P Carter, John A Crolla.   

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that translocation breakpoints in normal individuals are simple and do not disrupt genes, we characterised the breakpoints in 13 phenotypically normal individuals incidentally ascertained with an apparently balanced reciprocal translocation. Cases were karyotyped, and the breakpoints were refined by fluorescence in situ hybridisation until breakpoint-spanning clones were identified. 1 Mb array-CGH was performed as a whole genome analysis tool to detect any imbalances in chromatin not directly involved in the breakpoints. Breakpoint-associated imbalances were not found in any of the patients analysed in this study. However, breakpoints which disrupted known genes were identified in two patients, with RYR2 disrupted in one patient and COL13A1 in the other. In a further eight patients, Ensembl mapping data suggested that a gene might be disrupted by a breakpoint. In one further patient, the translocation was shown to be nonreciprocal. This study shows that apparently balanced reciprocal translocations in phenotypically normal patients do not have imbalances at the breakpoints, in contrast to phenotypically abnormal patients where the translocation breakpoints are often associated with cryptic imbalances. However, phenotypically normal individuals, and phenotypically abnormal individuals may have genes disrupted and therefore inactivated by one of the breakpoints. The significance of these disruptions remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16118644     DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  12 in total

1.  Ultra-high resolution array painting facilitates breakpoint sequencing.

Authors:  S M Gribble; D Kalaitzopoulos; D C Burford; E Prigmore; R R Selzer; B L Ng; N S W Matthews; K M Porter; R Curley; S J Lindsay; J Baptista; T A Richmond; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  Molecular genetic analysis of a de novo balanced translocation t(6;17)(p21.31;q11.2) associated with hypospadias and anorectal malformation.

Authors:  Mahmoud Reza Mansouri; Birgit Carlsson; Edward Davey; Agneta Nordenskjöld; Tomas Wester; Göran Annerén; Göran Läckgren; Niklas Dahl
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Unexpected complexity at breakpoint junctions in phenotypically normal individuals and mechanisms involved in generating balanced translocations t(1;22)(p36;q13).

Authors:  Marzena Gajecka; Andrew J Gentles; Albert Tsai; David Chitayat; Katherine L Mackay; Caron D Glotzbach; Michael R Lieber; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort.

Authors:  Julia Baptista; Catherine Mercer; Elena Prigmore; Susan M Gribble; Nigel P Carter; Viv Maloney; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; John A Crolla
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilse Feenstra; Nicolien Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Helger Yntema; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Dorien Lugtenberg; Joke Verheij; Andrew Green; Roel Hordijk; William Reardon; Bert de Vries; Han Brunner; Ernie Bongers; Nicole de Leeuw; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  The relationship between genome structure and function.

Authors:  A Marieke Oudelaar; Douglas R Higgs
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Prediction of a rare chromosomal aberration simultaneously with next generation sequencing-based comprehensive chromosome screening in human preimplantation embryos for recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Yi-Xuan Lee; Chien-Wen Chen; Yi-Hui Lin; Chii-Ruey Tzeng; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-30       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Recurrence, submicroscopic complexity, and potential clinical relevance of copy gains detected by array CGH that are shown to be unbalanced insertions by FISH.

Authors:  Nicholas J Neill; Blake C Ballif; Allen N Lamb; Sumit Parikh; J Britt Ravnan; Roger A Schultz; Beth S Torchia; Jill A Rosenfeld; Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Unbalanced translocations arise from diverse mutational mechanisms including chromothripsis.

Authors:  Brooke Weckselblatt; Karen E Hermetz; M Katharine Rudd
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 9.043

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.