Literature DB >> 16115931

Pharmacokinetics of dactinomycin in a pediatric patient population: a United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Study.

Gareth J Veal1, Michael Cole, Julie Errington, Annie Parry, Juliet Hale, Andrew D J Pearson, Karen Howe, Julia C Chisholm, Carol Beane, Bernadette Brennan, Fiona Waters, Adam Glaser, Sue Hemsworth, Heather McDowell, Yvonne Wright, Kathy Pritchard-Jones, Ross Pinkerton, Gail Jenner, James Nicholson, Ann M Elsworth, Alan V Boddy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Dactinomycin (actinomycin D) is an antitumor antibiotic used routinely to treat certain pediatric and adult cancers. Despite concerns over the incidence of toxicity, little is known about the pharmacology of dactinomycin. A study was done to investigate dactinomycin pharmacokinetics in children. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Dactinomycin was administered to 31 patients by bolus i.v. infusion, at doses of 0.70 to 1.50 mg/m2. Plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry up to 24 hours after drug administration and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria was assessed.
RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic data analysis suggested that a three-compartment model most accurately reflected dactinomycin pharmacokinetics. However, there was insufficient data available to fully characterize this model. A median peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of 25.1 ng/mL (range, 3.2-99.2 ng/mL) was observed at 15 minutes after administration. The median exposure (AUC0-6), determined in 16 patients with sampling to 6 hours, was 2.67 mg/L.min (range, 1.12-4.90 mg/L.min). After adjusting for body size, AUC0-6 and Cmax were positively related to dose (P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). Patients who experienced any level of Common Toxicity Criteria grade had a 1.46-fold higher AUC0-6, 95% confidence interval (1.02-2.09). AUC0-6 was higher in patients <40 kg, possibly indicating a greater toxicity risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Data presented suggest that dosing of dactinomycin based on surface area is not optimal, either in younger patients in whom the risk of toxicity is greater, or in older patients where doses are capped.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16115931     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  20 in total

1.  Modeling and simulation approaches to evaluate pharmacokinetic sampling contamination from central venous catheters in pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of actinomycin-D: a report from the children's oncology group.

Authors:  Alena Y Z Edwards; Jeffrey M Skolnik; Erin Dombrowsky; Dimple Patel; Jeffrey S Barrett
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 2.  Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of classical cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Dactinomycin and vincristine toxicity in the treatment of childhood cancer: a retrospective study from the Children's Oncology Group.

Authors:  Bryan Langholz; Jeffrey M Skolnik; Jeffrey S Barrett; Jamie Renbarger; Nita L Seibel; Anne Zajicek; Carola A S Arndt
Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacology in the adolescent oncology patient.

Authors:  Gareth J Veal; Christine M Hartford; Clinton F Stewart
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Characterisation of the clinical pharmacokinetics of actinomycin D and the influence of ABCB1 pharmacogenetic variation on actinomycin D disposition in children with cancer.

Authors:  Christopher R Hill; Michael Cole; Julie Errington; Ghada Malik; Alan V Boddy; Gareth J Veal
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Transcription inhibition of heat shock proteins: a strategy for combination of 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin and actinomycin d.

Authors:  Fabiola Cervantes-Gomez; Ramadevi Nimmanapalli; Varsha Gandhi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Simultaneous inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways augment the sensitivity to actinomycin D in Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Takatoshi Yamamoto; Takatoshi Ohno; Kazuhiko Wakahara; Akihito Nagano; Gou Kawai; Mitsuru Saitou; Iori Takigami; Aya Matsuhashi; Kazunari Yamada; Katsuji Shimizu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Phase 2 trial of recombinant tumor necrosis factor-alpha in combination with dactinomycin in children with recurrent Wilms tumor.

Authors:  Holly J Meany; Nita L Seibel; Junfeng Sun; Jerry Z Finklestein; Judith Sato; John Kelleher; Paul Sondel; Gregory Reaman
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.456

9.  The role of solute carrier (SLC) transporters in actinomycin D pharmacokinetics in paediatric cancer patients.

Authors:  Hannah Yejin Kim; Gareth J Veal; Fanfan Zhou; Alan V Boddy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  Characterisation of the roles of ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 and ABCG2 in the transport and pharmacokinetics of actinomycin D in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Christopher R Hill; David Jamieson; Huw D Thomas; Colin D A Brown; Alan V Boddy; Gareth J Veal
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 5.858

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.