Literature DB >> 16115114

EverCare nurse practitioner practice activities: similarities and differences across five sites.

Lisa M Abdallah1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the similarities and differences in the performance and frequency of performance of EverCare nurse practitioner (NP) practice activities at demonstration sites in five states. This study builds upon a previous study in which the development and testing of the EverCare Nurse Practitioner Role and Activity Scale (ENPRAS) was conducted. DATA SOURCES: A Background Data Sheet and the ENPRAS, a 99-item tool that encompasses six role subscales-Collaborator, Clinician, Care Manager/Coordinator, Counselor, Communicator/Cheerleader, and Coach/Educator, were completed by 127 EverCare NPs at demonstration sites in five states (Georgia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Colorado, and Florida).
CONCLUSIONS: Performance of NP activities across the demonstration sites in five states was generally consistent, with significant differences only in the amount of time spent on activities associated with the Collaborator and Coach/Educator roles. Overall, EverCare NPs spent more time on Clinician and Communicator/Cheerleader role activities than on activities associated with the other roles. EverCare NP patient caseload was positively related to frequency of performance of the Clinician and Care Manager/Coordinator roles. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: EverCare NPs provide proactive primary care to long-stay nursing home residents. The observed consistency reflects a strong centrally directed practice model. The identified roles and activities of the EverCare NP are consistent with previous studies and reports focused on the roles and activities of NPs who provide care to nursing home residents in other models of care delivery. Policy makers, healthcare providers, and the public should take these findings into account when considering a national model of care for this population. Future studies should examine the effect of variations in performance of activities on resident-specific and setting-specific outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16115114     DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2005.00063.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract        ISSN: 1041-2972


  6 in total

Review 1.  Transitional care.

Authors:  Mary Naylor; Stacen A Keating
Journal:  Am J Nurs       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.220

2.  Involvement of Advanced Practice Nurse in the Management of Geriatric Conditions: Examples from Different Countries.

Authors:  B Fougère; C Lagourdette; P Abele; B Resnick; M Rantz; C Kam Yuk Lai; Q Chen; W Moyle; B Vellas; J E Morley
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

3.  Resident and family perceptions of the nurse practitioner role in long term care settings: a qualitative descriptive study.

Authors:  Jenny Ploeg; Sharon Kaasalainen; Carrie McAiney; Ruth Martin-Misener; Faith Donald; Abigail Wickson-Griffiths; Nancy Carter; Esther Sangster-Gormley; Lori Schindel Martin; Kevin Brazil; Alan Taniguchi
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2013-09-27

4.  Substituting physicians with nurse practitioners, physician assistants or nurses in nursing homes: protocol for a realist evaluation case study.

Authors:  Marleen Hermien Lovink; Anke Persoon; Anneke J A H van Vught; Lisette Schoonhoven; Raymond T C M Koopmans; Miranda G H Laurant
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  How to Design a Remote Patient Monitoring System? A French Case Study.

Authors:  Marie Ferrua; Etienne Minvielle; Aude Fourcade; Benoît Lalloué; Claude Sicotte; Mario Di Palma; Olivier Mir
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  How do case managers spend time on their functions and activities?

Authors:  Emily Chuanmei You; David Dunt; Colleen Doyle
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.