Literature DB >> 16113054

Meat and meat-mutagen intake and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results from a NCI-SEER case-control study.

Amanda J Cross1, Mary H Ward, Maryjean Schenk, Martin Kulldorff, Wendy Cozen, Scott Davis, Joanne S Colt, Patricia Hartge, James R Cerhan, Rashmi Sinha.   

Abstract

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) incidence has risen dramatically over past decades, but the reasons for most of this increase are not known. Meat cooked well-done using high-temperature cooking techniques produces heterocyclic amines (HCAs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) such as benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). This study was conducted as a population-based case-control study in Iowa, Detroit, Seattle and Los Angeles and was designed to determine whether meat, meat-cooking methods, HCAs or PAHs from meat were associated with NHL risk. This study consisted of 458 NHL cases, diagnosed between 1998 and 2000, and 383 controls. Participants completed a 117-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), with graphical aids to assess the meat-cooking method and doneness level, which was linked to a HCA and B[a]P database. Logistic regression, comparing the fourth to the first quartile, found no association between red meat or processed meat intake and risk for NHL [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10 (0.67-1.81) and 1.18 (0.74-1.89), respectively]. A marginally significant elevated risk for NHL was associated with broiled meat [OR and 95% CI: 1.32 (0.99-1.77); P trend = 0.09], comparing those who consumed broiled meat with those who did not. The degree to which meat was cooked was not associated with the risk for NHL, although one of the HCAs, DiMeIQx (2-amino-3,4,8-trimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline), was associated with an inverse risk. Fat intake was associated with a significantly elevated risk for NHL [OR and 95% CI: 1.60 (1.05-2.45); P trend = 0.12]; in contrast, animal protein was inversely associated with risk for NHL [OR and 95% CI: 0.39 (0.22-0.70); P trend = 0.004]. Overall, our study suggests that consumption of meat, whether or not it is well-done, does not increase the risk of NHL. Furthermore, neither HCAs nor B[a]P from meat increase the risk of NHL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16113054     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgi212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  19 in total

1.  Meat intake is not associated with risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a large prospective cohort of U.S. men and women.

Authors:  Carrie R Daniel; Rashmi Sinha; Yikyung Park; Barry I Graubard; Albert R Hollenbeck; Lindsay M Morton; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the developing world: review of 4539 cases from the International Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Classification Project.

Authors:  Anamarija M Perry; Jacques Diebold; Bharat N Nathwani; Kenneth A MacLennan; Hans K Müller-Hermelink; Martin Bast; Eugene Boilesen; James O Armitage; Dennis D Weisenburger
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  Dietary Meat Categories and Descriptions in Chronic Disease Research Are Substantively Different within and between Experimental and Observational Studies: A Systematic Review and Landscape Analysis.

Authors:  Lauren E O'Connor; Cody L Gifford; Dale R Woerner; Julia L Sharp; Keith E Belk; Wayne W Campbell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  Dietary fat intake and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2 large prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Kimberly A Bertrand; Edward Giovannucci; Bernard A Rosner; Shumin M Zhang; Francine Laden; Brenda M Birmann
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 5.  Obesity, diet and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Christine F Skibola
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Trans fatty acid intake is associated with increased risk and n3 fatty acid intake with reduced risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Bridget Charbonneau; Helen M O'Connor; Alice H Wang; Mark Liebow; Carrie A Thompson; Zachary S Fredericksen; William R Macon; Susan L Slager; Timothy G Call; Thomas M Habermann; James R Cerhan
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Subtype of dietary fat in relation to risk of Hodgkin lymphoma: a population-based case-control study in Connecticut and Massachusetts.

Authors:  Yongshun Gao; Qian Li; Bryan A Bassig; Ellen T Chang; Min Dai; Qin Qin; Yawei Zhang; Tongzhang Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Phytanic acid and the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Nicholas J Ollberding; Briseis Aschebrook-Kilfoy; Donne Bennett D Caces; Margaret E Wright; Dennis D Weisenburger; Sonali M Smith; Brian C-H Chiu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Etiologic heterogeneity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes.

Authors:  Lindsay M Morton; Sophia S Wang; Wendy Cozen; Martha S Linet; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Scott Davis; Richard K Severson; Joanne S Colt; Mohammad A Vasef; Nathaniel Rothman; Aaron Blair; Leslie Bernstein; Amanda J Cross; Anneclaire J De Roos; Eric A Engels; David W Hein; Deirdre A Hill; Linda E Kelemen; Unhee Lim; Charles F Lynch; Maryjean Schenk; Sholom Wacholder; Mary H Ward; Shelia Hoar Zahm; Stephen J Chanock; James R Cerhan; Patricia Hartge
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Dietary flavonoid intake and non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk.

Authors:  Cara L Frankenfeld; James R Cerhan; Wendy Cozen; Scott Davis; Maryjean Schenk; Lindsay M Morton; Patricia Hartge; Mary H Ward
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.