Literature DB >> 16112951

Is mammographic density, as currently measured, a robust surrogate marker for breast cancer?

Martin Yaffe1, Susan Hendrix, Malcolm Pike, Richard Santen, John Eden, Ar Genazzani.   

Abstract

In order to determine current beliefs concerning the relevance of breast mammographic percent density (MPD) as a surrogate marker for breast cancer, the panel and the delegates completed a questionnaire. There was general agreement between the panel and delegates on most aspects, although the delegates were unsure whether high breast MPD is a contraindication for hormone therapy and tended to err on the side of caution in suggesting that estrogen and estrogen/progestogen therapy should be stopped before screening mammography. The overall consensus of the panel and the delegates was that breast MPD should become an important clinical tool, and that carefully designed studies are needed to determine exactly how it can be best used to guide clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112951     DOI: 10.1080/09513590400030004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical opinion: the biologic and pharmacologic principles for age-adjusted long-term estrogen therapy.

Authors:  Morris Notelovitz
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-03-28

2.  Dietary vitamin D and calcium intake and mammographic density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Rowan T Chlebowski; Joann E Manson; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Aaron K Aragaki; Rulla M Tamimi; Kathryn M Rexrode; Cynthia A Thomson; Thomas E Rohan; Jennifer D Peck; Etta D Pisano; Christopher F Martin; Gloria Sarto; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Mammographic density, plasma vitamin D levels and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Angela K Green; Susan E Hankinson; Elizabeth R Bertone-Johnson; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Common variants in ZNF365 are associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sara Lindström; Celine M Vachon; Jingmei Li; Jajini Varghese; Deborah Thompson; Ruth Warren; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Tina Audley; Nicholas J Wareham; Ruth J F Loos; Andrew D Paterson; Johanna Rommens; Darryl Waggott; Lisa J Martin; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Susan E Hankinson; Aditi Hazra; David J Hunter; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Stephen J Chanock; Isabel dos Santos Silva; JianJun Liu; Louise Eriksson; Fergus J Couch; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Kamila Czene; Peter Kraft; Per Hall; Douglas F Easton; Norman F Boyd; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Association between 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D and volumetric breast density via a fully automated software Volpara™ in the reproductive age group.

Authors:  Bushra Wasim; Khalid Khan; Mohd Abdul Samad
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Different measures of smoking exposure and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Nils Bjurstam; Inger T Gram
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.466

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.