Literature DB >> 16112708

Anaerobic digestion of animal waste: effect of mode of mixing.

Khursheed Karim1, Rebecca Hoffmann, K Thomas Klasson, M H Al-Dahhan.   

Abstract

Laboratory-scale digesters were operated to study the effect of mixing (via biogas recirculation, impeller mixing, and slurry recirculation) on biogas production. Three sets of experiments were performed using cow manure slurry feed with either 50, 100, or 150 g/L total solids (TS) concentrations (referred in the text as 5%, 10%, and 15% manure slurry). The experiments were conducted at a controlled temperature of 35 degrees C and a hydraulic retention time of 16.2 days, resulting in TS loadings of 3.1, 6.2, and 9.3g/Ld for 5%, 10%, and 15% manure slurry feeds, respectively. Results showed that the unmixed and mixed digesters performed quite similarly when fed with 5% manure slurry and produced biogas at a rate of 0.84-0.94 L/Ld. The methane yield was found to be 0.26-0.28 L CH4/g volatile solids loaded. However, the effect of mixing and the mode of mixing became important when the digesters were fed thick manure slurry feeds (10% and 15%). Digesters fed with 10% and 15% manure slurry and equipped with external mixing produced about 10-30% more biogas than the unmixed digester. While the mixed digesters produced more biogas than unmixed digesters, digester mixing during start-up was not beneficial, as it resulted in lower pH, performance instability and prolonged start-up time. Mixing using biogas recirculation system was found not to be effective in the case of 15% manure slurry feed under the experimental conditions studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112708     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.06.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  8 in total

1.  Effects of sludge recirculation rate and mixing time on performance of a prototype single-stage anaerobic digester for conversion of food wastes to biogas and energy recovery.

Authors:  Chavalit Ratanatamskul; Tawinan Saleart
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Current challenges of high-solid anaerobic digestion and possible measures for its effective applications: a review.

Authors:  Julius G Akinbomi; Regina J Patinvoh; Mohammad J Taherzadeh
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 3.  Bioengineered bioreactors: a review on enhancing biomethane and biohydrogen production by CFD modeling.

Authors:  Anand Kumar Saini; Tanja Radu; Kunwar Paritosh; Vinod Kumar; Nidhi Pareek; Dharmendra Tripathi; Vivekanand Vivekanand
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

4.  Dynamic Effect of Operational Regulation on the Mesophilic BioMethanation of Grape Marc.

Authors:  Josue Kassongo; Esmaeil Shahsavari; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  Determining Optimal Temperature Combination for Effective Pretreatment and Anaerobic Digestion of Corn Stalk.

Authors:  Juan Li; Xiujin Li; Akiber Chufo Wachemo; Weiwei Chen; Xiaoyu Zuo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Anaerobic co-digestion of agricultural wastes toward circular bioeconomy.

Authors:  Shu-Yuan Pan; Cheng-Yen Tsai; Chen-Wuing Liu; Sheng-Wei Wang; Hyunook Kim; Chihhao Fan
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-06-10

Review 7.  Microbial anaerobic digestion (bio-digesters) as an approach to the decontamination of animal wastes in pollution control and the generation of renewable energy.

Authors:  Christy E Manyi-Loh; Sampson N Mamphweli; Edson L Meyer; Anthony I Okoh; Golden Makaka; Michael Simon
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The active microbial community more accurately reflects the anaerobic digestion process: 16S rRNA (gene) sequencing as a predictive tool.

Authors:  Jo De Vrieze; Ameet J Pinto; William T Sloan; Umer Zeeshan Ijaz
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 14.650

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.